Category Archives: Robocalls

#Harper’s 2013 #DumpsterFire Flashback: Op-Ed: Stephen Harper puts Conservatives in a bind. #cdnpoli #elxn42

Since so many “conservatives” and former supporters of the Harper Regime have either been tossed under the bus or simply jumped off the omnibus, let’s dig through our archives and take a trip down memory lane, since it appears as if the yellow journalists at Postmedia are still busy heavily censoring and restricting access to past articles that cast their ideologically driven despot Stephen Harper into the negative spotlight.

That being stated, please take a few moments to review the following op-ed(s) published in late November 2013 by former conservative communications consultant David Sachs in the Ottawa Citizen. It should be worth noting, and we have, the censored Ottawa Citizen version of the op-ed compared to the version published via the Times Colonist on 29 November 2013…

CENSORED Op-Ed: Stephen Harper puts Conservatives in a bind By David Sachs, Ottawa Citizen November 25, 2013
CENSORED Op-Ed: Stephen Harper puts Conservatives in a bind By David Sachs, Ottawa Citizen November 25, 2013

Op-Ed: Stephen Harper puts Conservatives in a bind

By David Sachs, Ottawa Citizen November 25, 2013

The conservative mindset understands that power tends to corrupt. How far will we let it corrupt us? I have been involved in party work for more than a decade and I call on other party members to demand answers, or resignation from our leader.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper has long employed the cynical strategy of total denial when faced with controversy, disregarding the public’s right to the truth.

He knows the public will never follow the minutiae of events. As long as solidarity is maintained, Harper can ride out any storm by claiming it is just more partisan noise. Only we Conservatives have the power to break that solidarity, and take away Harper’s trump card. It’s time to demonstrate that Conservatives care about ethics and ultimately, checks on that corrupting influence of power.

Some of the prime minister’s key people have conspired to undermine Senate investigations, to influence a third-party financial audit and ultimately to pay off a senator, all, in tragic irony, to maintain an illusion of party ethics. The prime minister has, in the kindest interpretation, hidden the full truth.

Is that acceptable to you, as a Canadian and a Conservative?

As Conservatives, there is much Harper and his government have done to be proud of. But as more power is seized by the unelected members of Harper’s inner circle; as more of his key, chosen people turn out to be ethically unsound or worse, we must ask: how far will we let our own leader go?

Some Conservatives argue this tempest is all over a small amount of money. But if the prime minister’s key people are willing to go to such lengths over such a small issue, solely to maintain (how ironic) the façade of ethics, how far would they go over big issues? Does anyone trust this government to deal openly when facing major challenges?

We Conservatives have a rare opportunity. Our opponents are weak and divided. Our team is strong and experienced. If we force Harper to answer truthfully or resign, we gain back our ethical platform. We give a new leader a chance to run in the next election from the prime minister’s office. Even if we lose one election, we will likely face a short-term minority government with a flawed leader. In the big picture, this is the least risky time to change a faulty part.

If we do not act, we embolden Harper. We increase the risk of further ethical scandals. Make no mistake: if Harper continues like this, he will fall, and he will take our party down with it. It will be hard to win an election for a decade. We should control the process.

As a first action, our senators need to make themselves heard. They can break that façade of Conservative solidarity that Harper depends on. Here is a chance to show that they matter, and to take real action to reverse the slide of ethical responsibility we have seen under successive governments of various party stripes.

Ask what is democracy if an elected leader abuses all the levers of power? If he, or his people, manipulate independent branches of government (Senate, Parliamentary Budget Officer)? If he, or people acting on his behalf, abuse the electoral process (as in the allegations of electoral fraud), and then abuse the investigative process (the independent Deloitte audit)? If our leaders hide the truth as common practice?

Harper is no dictator. Call on Harper to speak the truth at last. If he can pull the party back from this slide, he can yet rescue his leadership. If not, he must go.

Harper is putting each of us Conservatives in an ethical bind, and we should resent him for this. We will never be united as a party, let alone as a country, when we are each so divided within ourselves. We need to make ourselves and our country right, and demand ethical, accountable government whatever its colours.

David Sachs is a Conservative communications consultant who has worked for cabinet ministers Lawrence Cannon and Peter Kent. He is a board member of the Pontiac Conservative Riding Association in Quebec.
© Copyright (c) The Ottawa Citizen
 
continue reading source: http://www.ottawacitizen.com/story_print.html?id=9211218&sponsor=dumpharper
or (http://www.ottawacitizen.com/opinion/op-ed/Stephen+Harper+puts+Conservatives+bind/9211218/story.html)


David Sachs: Stephen Harper puts Conservatives in a bind

David Sachs / Times Colonist
November 29, 2013 04:29 PM

The conservative mindset understands that power tends to corrupt. How far will we let it corrupt us?

I have been involved in party work for more than a decade and I call on other party members to demand answers or resignation from our leader.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper has long employed the cynical strategy of total denial when faced with controversy, disregarding the public’s right to the truth.

He knows the public will never follow the minutiae of events. As long as solidarity is maintained, Harper can ride out any storm by claiming it is just more partisan noise. Only we Conservatives have the power to break that solidarity and take away Harper’s trump card.

It’s time to demonstrate that Conservatives care about ethics and, ultimately, checks on that corrupting influence of power.

Some of the prime minister’s key people have conspired to undermine Senate investigations, to influence a third-party financial audit and ultimately to pay off a senator, all, in tragic irony, to maintain an illusion of party ethics. The prime minister has, in the kindest interpretation, hidden the full truth.

Is that acceptable to Canadians and Conservatives?

As Conservatives, there is much Harper and his government have done to be proud of. But as more power is seized by the unelected members of Harper’s inner circle, as more of his key chosen people turn out to be ethically unsound or worse, we must ask: How far will we let our own leader go?

Some Conservatives argue this tempest is all over a small amount of money. But if the prime minister’s key people are willing to go to such lengths over such a small issue, solely to maintain the façade of ethics, how far would they go over big issues?

Does anyone trust this government to deal openly when facing major challenges?

We Conservatives have a rare opportunity. Our opponents are weak and divided. Our team is strong and experienced. If we force Harper to answer truthfully or resign, we gain back our ethical platform. We give a new leader a chance to run in the next election from the prime minister’s office.

Even if we lose one election, we will likely face a short-term minority government with a flawed leader. In the big picture, this is the least risky time to change a faulty part.

If we do not act, we embolden Harper. We increase the risk of further ethical scandals.

Make no mistake: if Harper continues like this, he will fall and he will take our party down with him. It will be hard to win an election for a decade. We should control the process.

As a first action, our senators need to make themselves heard. They can break that facade of Conservative solidarity that Harper depends on. Here is a chance to show that they matter and to take real action to reverse the slide of ethical responsibility we have seen under successive governments of various party stripes.

What is democracy if an elected leader abuses all the levers of power? If he or his people manipulate independent branches of government (Senate, Parliamentary Budget Officer)? If he or people acting on his behalf abuse the electoral process (as in the allegations of electoral fraud), and then abuse the investigative process (the independent Deloitte audit)? If our leaders hide the truth as common practice?

Harper is no dictator. We should call on him to speak the truth at last. If he can pull the party back from this slide, he can yet rescue his leadership. If not, he must go.

Harper is putting each of us Conservatives in an ethical bind, and we should resent him for this. We will never be united as a party, let alone as a country, when we are so divided within ourselves.

We need to make ourselves and our country right, and demand ethical, accountable government, whatever its colours.

David Sachs is a Conservative communications consultant who has worked for cabinet ministers Lawrence Cannon and Peter Kent. He is a board member of the Pontiac Conservative Riding Association in Quebec.
© Copyright Times Colonist

continue reading source: http://www.timescolonist.com/opinion/columnists/david-sachs-stephen-harper-puts-conservatives-in-a-bind-1.714067

Please note: As of this posting (Election Day 2015) both of the above (Ottawa Citizen) urls currently lead to an error page at the Ottawa Citizen propaganda outlet BUT the Time Colonist url is still active. While you ponder that, be sure to check out the following video explaining the Harper Regime’s “free trade” policy trade offs.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7JA7PXXCJo
 


Remember, politics is a contact sport, like hockey, so please feel free to add quick contributions, observations and relevant information as a comment below!

Contact us if you would like to contribute to our collaborative efforts or would like to share/submit articles, data or additional content, feel free to add feedback, additional info, alternative contact details, related links, articles, anonymous submission, etc. as a comment below, via web-form, through social media outlets or email us directly and confidentially at: dumpharper [at] live [dot] ca


This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. and intend its use to be for education and instructional purposes only. Therefore, we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond “fair use,” you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

ShareAlike Statement: https://dumpharper.wordpress.com/sharealike/

#Harper’s #DumpsterFire: #Despotism vs #Democracy (Explained in 1946) #cdnpoli #elxn42

Since it is early morning on the 42nd Election, 2015 Edition, we felt it may be in our best interest as a Nation to review an “Old Stock” educational film that explains the differences between Despotism and Democracy to encourage everyone to think really hard before traveling to the polls. We would like to especially deliver this to the “undecided” potential conservative voters that may, or may not, grasp the importance of placing their Country above the Harper Regime’s ideology. In other words, it may be worth considering the option of falling on your swords with dignity today with honour as opposed to casting your kids and grand-kids futures under the ReformaCon bus while falling under another’s sword in disgrace. Below you will find the video that we have uploaded via our ytube channel followed by the transcripts for those that may like to read along or have trouble viewing as it has been rumoured that this is being blocked in Canada. As always, we encourage sharing and commenting…


#Harper’s #DumpsterFire: #Despotism vs #Democracy (Explained in 1946) #cdnpoli #elxn42

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YxkyF3CgY4


Despotism

by Encyclopaedia Britannica Films
Published: 1946
Usage: Public Domain
Topics: Political science

Measures how a society ranks on a spectrum stretching from democracy to despotism. Explains how societies and nations can be measured by the degree that power is concentrated and respect for the individual is restricted. Where does your community, state and nation stand on these scales?

The companion Encyclopedia Britannica Film “Democracy” can be found here.
Run time: 11:00
Producer: Encyclopaedia Britannica Films
Audio/Visual:sound, B&W

Shotlist

Illustrates the thesis that all communities can be ranged on a scale running from democracy to despotism. The two chief characteristics of despotism — restricted respect and concentrated power — are defined and illustrated. Two of the conditions which have historically promoted the growth of despotism are explained and exemplified. These are a slanted economic distribution and a strict control of the agencies of communication.

The end of World War II gave impetus to the “one-worlder movement.” Sparked by the sense that nationalism engendered conflict, this movement for world government viewed nationhood as a relic made obsolete in an age of economic interdependence and rapid air transportation. The movement was marked by the release of films calling for world government, such as Man: One Family; We, the Peoples; Brotherhood of Man; and Our Shrinking World, and exposing the nature of fascist and authoritarian rule.

Despotism treats the idea of nationhood differently than most other educational films. It sees nations not as static entities but dynamically, moving towards democracy or despotism as conditions change. This outlook doesn’t mesh well with old cliches about patriotism and democracy, because it doesn’t necessarily see the American system as democracy’s highest achievement.

Despotism offers a number of indicators by which the degree of democracy or despotism in a society can be measured, using a sliding, thermometer-like animated scale. According to an article in The New York Times (March 16, 1946), an advisory board of educators debated for eighteen months (at seventy-five conferences) over the definition of the terms “democracy” and “despotism,” the titles of the two films released at the same time. Finally, a compromise was reached, resulting in the “respect scale” and the “power scale” that we see in Despotism.

So how does our own system measure up? The film becomes a little frightening as we consider where we stand with regard to indicators like economic distribution, concentration of land ownership, regressive taxation and centralized control of information. Draw your own conclusions.


[Despotism. An Erpi Classroom Film. Produced by Encyclopaedia Britannica Films, Inc. in collaboration with Harold D. Lasswell, Ph.D., Yale University. Copyright MCMXLV by Encyclopaedia Britannica Films Inc. All rights reserved. main titles graphic design art cards]

You can roughly locate any community in the world somewhere along a scale running all the way from democracy to despotism. One at the democracy end, another somewhere in the middle, and a third (inaudible). [rotating globes rulers animation graphs charts measurement quantification scales measures points pointers]

Let’s find out about despotism. This man makes it his job to study these things. “Well for one thing, avoid the comfortable idea that the mere form of government can of itself safeguard a nation against despotism. [maps charts wallcharts professors academics commentators authorities]

Germany under President Hindenburg was a republic. And yet in this republic an aggressive despotism took root and flourished under Adolf Hitler. [maps flags art cards swastikas animation James Brill narrators]

When a competent observer looks for signs of despotism in a community, he looks beyond fine words and noble phrases.” “. . . for which it stands, one nation indivisible with liberty and justice for all.” [saluting flag pledge of allegiance flags hands over hearts lynchings hangings gallows capital punishment condemnation death murder ropes nooses]

“Many observers have found that two workable yardsticks help in discovering how near a community is to despotism. The respect scale and the power scale. [goal variables charts graphs posters pointing fingers]

A careful observer can use a respect scale to find how many citizens get an even break. As a community moves towards despotism, respect is restricted to fewer people. [shared fairness equality]

A community is low on a respect scale if common courtesy is withheld from large groups of people on account of their political attitudes; if people are rude to others because they think their wealth and position gives them that right, or because they don’t like a man’s race or his religion. [drugstores soda Palmer Pharmacy pharmacies prescriptions candy cosmetics Scarlet Stores pedestrians people walking sidewalks storm troopers goons fascists military uniforms SA men SS men brownshirts brown shirts Nazis Sam Browne belts leather boots spectators Good Germans Jewish people Jews anti-Semitism antisemitism racism prejudice bigotry private doors offices bosses employers management class chauvinism classism For a quiet, restful vacation. Camp Gentilhomme on the Lake. Reservation Blank.

Gentlemen: Enclosed please find $ — deposit for my party of: name, address, date of arrival, religion. We solicit Gentile patronage only. Are there any Hebrews in your party? Yes or no. I hereby swear that the above statements are true. Signed application blanks pencils pointing]

Equal opportunity for all citizens to develop useful skills is one basis for rating a community on a respect scale. The opportunity to develop useful skills is important but not enough. [schools colleges universities lawns trees graduates steps stairs mothers cap and gown mortarboards parental pride pictures snapshots photography parents diplomas]

The equally important opportunity to put skills to use is a further test on a respect scale. [newspapers jobs applications employment offices unemployment work lines employment agencies]

A power scale is another important yardstick of despotism. It gauges the citizen’s share in making the community’s decisions. Communities which concentrate decision making in a few hands rate low on a power scale and are moving towards despotism. Like France under the Bourbon kings, one of whom said, “The state – I am the state.” [shared concentrated political power democracy equestrian statues horses statuary public art]

Today democracy can ebb away in communities whose citizens allow power to become concentrated in the hands of bosses. “What I say goes. See, I’m the law around here. Ha ha ha.” [government buildings smoke fires political power Tammany Hall machines laughs laughing newspaper reporters press]

The test of despotic power is that it can disregard the will of the people. It rules without the consent of the governed. [Declaration of Independence July 4, 1776 booklets opening inserts printed pieces In Congress, the unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.]

Look beyond the legal formalities of an election in measuring a community on the power scale to see if the ballot is really free. [fascists Nazis elections voting booths rigged storm troopers soldiers terrorism voters crosses hats uniforms Sam Browne belts hats control]

If the citizens can vote only the way they are told, a community approaches despotism.

When legislatures become ceremonial assemblies only, and have no real control over lawmaking, their community rates low on a power scale. “Sieg Heil. Sieg Heil.” [Germany Third Reich Nazis Adolf Hitler swastikas ceremonies applause clapping newsreels salutes fascists fascism]

In a downright despotism, opposition is dangerous whether the despotism is official or whether it is unofficial. [signs fences concentration camps Camp 33 for Political Offenders political prisoners prisons prison camps hoods hanging nooses ropes executions deaths capital punishment condemned people murder flames fires burning crosses Ku Klux Klan terrorism hoods racism]

“The spread of respect and power in a community is influenced by certain conditions which many observers measure by means of the economic distribution and information scales.” [instrumental variables]

If a community’s economic distribution becomes slanted, its middle income groups grow smaller and despotism stands a better chance to gain a foothold. [balanced distribution of wealth money affluence poverty]

Where land is privately owned, one sign of a poorly balanced economy is the concentration of land ownership in the hands of a very small number of people.

When farmers lose their farms they lose their independence. This one can stay on, but not as his own boss any more. To the extent that this condition exists throughout a nation, the likelihood of despotism is increased. [couples men women John J. Shea v. Walter Leeds.

Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale. mortgages fingers pointing United States maps animation]

In communities which depend almost entirely on a single industry, such as a factory or mine, maintaining economic balance is a challenging problem. [company towns monopolies smokestacks factories animation]

If this condition exists over the nation as a whole, so that the control of jobs and business opportunities is in a few hands, despotism stands a good chance. Another sign of a poorly balanced economy is a taxation system that presses heaviest on those least able to pay. [animation money graphs wealth national revenue large incomes small incomes regressive taxation]

A larger part of a small income is spent on necessities such as food. Sales taxes on such necessities hit the small income harder. [pie charts pie graphs large income small income]

In the days of the salt tax, feudal despotisms were partly sustained by this and other (inaudible). [historical recreations Colonial North America taxation without representation]

A community rates low on an information scale when the press, radio, and other channels of communication are controlled by only a few people and when citizens have to accept what they are told. In communities of this kind, despotism stands a good chance. [uncontrolled media monopolies monopolization oligopolies Time Warner Disney ABC Capital Cities Westinghouse CBS NBC General Electric Fox News Corporation Turner CNN critical evaluation automatic acceptance]

See how a community trains its teachers. “Bear this in mind. Young people cannot be trusted to form their own opinions. This business about open-mindedness is nonsense. It’s a waste of time trying to teach students to think for themselves. It’s our job to tell ’em.” [lecturers mental discipline drill classrooms agreement nodding heads manufacturing consent consensus]

And when teachers put such training into practice, despotism stands a good chance. These children are being taught to accept uncritically whatever they are told. Questions are not encouraged. [students conformity conditioning brainwashing writing learning education]

“How can you ask such a question? Have you got a textbook?” “Yes Ma’am.” “Does it say here that our law courts are always just?” “Yes Ma’am.” “Then how dare you question the fact? Sit down.”

And so we aren’t surprised when – “But it must be true. I saw it in this book right here.”

And if books and newspapers and the radio are efficiently controlled, the people will read and accept exactly what the few in control want them to. Government censorship is one form of control. [Ministry of Propaganda plaques signs doors windows Internal Censorship censors rubber stamps passed by censor deletions blue pencils manuscripts]
A newspaper which breaks a government censorship rule can be suspended. It is also possible for newspapers and other forms of communication to be controlled by private interests. [The Daily Citizen press control proclamations This Newspaper is Suspended editors journalists newspaper offices Advertising Manager Mgr.]

“I thought I told you to kill that story. It’ll cost us a lot of advertising.” “If that story goes out, I quit.” “All right.” [firings]

What sort of community do you live in? Where would you place it on a democracy/despotism scale? To find out, you can rate it on a respect scale and a power scale. And to find out what way it is likely to go in the future, you can rate it on economic distribution and information scales. [cities wipes]

The lower your community rates on economic distribution and information scales, the lower it is likely to rate on respect and power scales and thus to approach despotism.

What happens in a single community is the problem of its own citizens, but it is also the problem of us all because as communities go, so goes the nation. [animation United States]

[Encyclopaedia Britannica Films Inc. Bring the World to the Classroom. end titles]

Politics, Political science, Democracy, Despotism, Dictatorship, Censorship, Newspapers, Rubber stamps, Freedom of the press, Communism, Germany (Nazi) Third Reich, Students, Teachers, Political Indoctrination, Propaganda, Mass communications, Animation Graphic design Cartoons, Animation Scales (sliding), Information (visual), Surrealism, Capitalism, Economics

 

continue reading source: https://archive.org/details/Despotis1946

 


Remember, politics is a contact sport, like hockey, so please feel free to add quick contributions, observations and relevant information as a comment below!

Contact us if you would like to contribute to our collaborative efforts or would like to share/submit articles, data or additional content, feel free to add feedback, additional info, alternative contact details, related links, articles, anonymous submission, etc. as a comment below, via web-form, through social media outlets or email us directly and confidentially at: dumpharper [at] live [dot] ca


This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. and intend its use to be for education and instructional purposes only. Therefore, we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond “fair use,” you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

ShareAlike Statement: https://dumpharper.wordpress.com/sharealike/

Everything #cdnpoli needs to know about the #FairElectionsAct via: @globepolitics

A man casts his vote for the 2011 federal election in Toronto in this May, 2011 photo. Elections Canada is going to audit contributions made during the 2011 federal election campaign to nomination contestants, riding associations and candidates affiliated with the same parties. (Chris Young/The Canadian Press)

Everything you need to know about the Fair Elections Act


Canada’s election laws are set to change. A major government bill, the Fair Elections Act, is working its way through the House of Commons but has proven controversial. It’s a big deal, so here’s your crash course.

This page will stay updated as news develops. Submit your own questions by e-mail or Twitter.


Jump to questions:


What is the Fair Elections Act?

Essentially, it changes the rules for voters, candidates, parties and the people whose job it is to make sure elections are fair. Ottawa says it will boost penalties for offences, reduce voter fraud and empower political parties, as opposed to Elections Canada, to drive voter turnout. For some voters, it means it’ll be harder to cast a ballot – a voter will no longer be able to have someone vouch for his or her identity, a system the government argues is too vulnerable to fraud. Political parties will also get an amalgamated list showing if you voted or not, but not who you voted for, while Elections Canada will no longer be able to run advertising campaigns encouraging people to vote.

Reuters

Who’s behind it?

Pierre Poilievre – Canada’s Minister of State for Democratic Reform and, at 34, among the youngest faces in cabinet. Mr. Poilievre has tirelessly stumped for the bill in interviews and in the House of Commons. His go-to line is that the bill gives investigators a “sharper teeth, longer reach and a freer hand.” Many of the changes are meant to reduce fraud and rein in Elections Canada, which he says has failed to boost voter turnout.

What are the changes?

There are a lot. If you have time on your hands and a knack for legalese, you can read the bill for yourself here and look at some of the Chief Electoral Officer’s more detailed objections here. But we’ll give you the short version.

The Globe and Mail

1. Vouching

Under the current rules, “vouching” is the sort of voter-ID catch-all. If you don’t have the proper ID, someone can vouch for you so you can still vote. The list of ways to vote is here. Yes, it raises a question: “Who doesn’t have any ID?” Roughly 120,000 voters in 2011 didn’t, or about 1 per cent of voters. The Chief Electoral Officer says it’s often a case of someone who can prove their identity but not their current address, specifically – such as a student or someone who has moved. The bill also eliminates using a voter information card (the thing you get in the mail saying where to vote) as a way to corroborate where you live. Axing these two options essentially raises the bar on what’s required to cast a ballot, though an extra day of advance voting is being added. Both the current and former chief electoral officer have called, unequivocally, for vouching to be kept, as have provincial and territorial counterparts.

2. Campaign finance

Candidates face limits on what they can spend. This bill would exempt one important thing from those limits – fundraising calls to anyone who has donated $20 or more in the previous five years. Critics call it a new loophole. For instance, the cost of calls to past supporters urging them to support a party again could theoretically be exempted from spending limits if, at some point during the call, a party asks for a donation. This exemption would, presumably, benefit the party with the most donors and the most robust database. At the moment, that appears to be the Conservatives.


Mr. Poilievre argues fundraising is different from campaigning – and that party donors are the most earnest supporters, and therefore don’t often need to be called and reminded to vote. The NDP similarly exempted fundraising costs from spending limits in their leadership race, a point frequently cited by Mr. Poilievre. The NDP say it’s comparing apples to oranges. “There is a huge difference between an internal party race and the federal election,” NDP National Director Nathan Rotman said.


3. The Chief Electoral Officer

The head of Elections Canada is targeted. First, the bill limits what he can say publicly – a gag order, critics say – though Mr. Poilievre has already indicated they will amend this clause.

Critically, the CEO and Elections Canada also won’t be allowed to publicly encourage citizens to vote – as they have with ad campaigns in previous elections – but only give the technical information about where and how to vote. The Conservatives argue it’s up to political parties to drive voter turnout. Former chief electoral officer Jean-Pierre Kingsley told a committee the changes must not go through. If it does, “Canadians will lose their trust and confidence in our elections,” he told a committee.


4. The Commissioner of Canada Elections

Essentially the elections cop, the commissioner investigates people for shady campaigning, though has been criticized as ineffective by watchdogs. The bill will move the commissioner out of Elections Canada and into the officer of the Director of Public Prosecutions. Elections Canada’s current Chief Electoral Officer has warned this provision needs rules guaranteeing he and the Commissioner can still share information.

The former Chief Electoral Officer, Mr. Kingsley, said the change is a neutral one, because of a previous change that already requires the DPP to be involved. “To me, it’s ballgame over on that one and the [latest] change really isn’t affecting anything,” he said.

The bill creates new offences – for impersonating a candidate or elections officials, for instance – and hikes fines for those found guilty.

Elections Canada has also frequently asked for the power to seek a court order to force people to co-operate with investigations, a power held in other jurisdictions. This bill doesn’t offer that – in other words, in trying to tackle fraud, it doesn’t do what Elections Canada has long asked for to combat fraud.


5. Data of who voted

Parties will get “bingo cards” – checklists of which registered voters cast a ballot, and which didn’t. They currently can gather these piece-by-piece at each polling station, but gathering them all would require armies of volunteers and extensive co-ordination. It’s virtually impossible under current rules. This change will allow parties to further develop their databases of supporters.

6. Permission to hire

Currently, Elections Canada needs government approval to pay outside experts. This bill will require EC to seek Treasury Board approval for the hiring altogether. Northwest Territories Chief Electoral Officer David Brock said this should be abandoned, as the notion that Treasury Board might refuse such a request “muddles and undermines the basic relationship between the Chief Electoral Officer of Canada and Parliament.”

7. Poll clerks

The bill will allow local party associations – or, failing that, national parties themselves – to nominate deputy returning officers and poll clerks. (Currently, people for these positions can be nominated by the parties’ local candidates.) These are people who help oversee the vote at your local polling station. The Chief Electoral Officer warns the provision has no “operation benefit” and that waiting for nominations may not leave enough time to recruit and train proper officials. Under the bill, the party that won the most votes in a previous election will also be able to recommend people to act as central poll supervisor, a person in charge of a particular polling location. The Chief Electoral Officer says doing so will compromise the non-partisan nature of that role. The NWT Chief Electoral Officer also focused on this provision, saying all election officers – including central poll supervisors – be appointed by Elections Canada “without any influence by a registered political party.”

The Globe and Mail

8. Donation limits

They’re going up – in most cases, from $1,200 this year to $1,500 if passed, and $25 per year after. Two changes, however, will open the door to wealthier candidates, who would be able to donate $5,000 to a campaign or up to $25,000 to a party leadership campaign, specifically. Presently, the limits for those donations are just $1,000, but that’s on top of the $1,200 limit, meaning candidates can give their campaigns $2,200. Under the new rules, the limits are higher but the proposed new $1,500 general donation limit can no longer be tacked on to it.

9. Robocalls

The bill will require robo-calling firms, and people or groups (such as parties) that hire them, to keep a recording of each call, and records of when they were made, for up to one year. It will also require dates and scripts of live calls to be kept for a year. The Chief Electoral Officer has, however, objected to the bill failing to require companies to keep records of what numbers they call. Mr. Poilievre says that would be an invasion of privacy. The bill also creates new offences and higher fines for those caught making fraudulent calls. In short, robocalls can continue. Investigators can hear them and know when they took place – but not who they targeted. Democracy Watch, an advocacy group, argues numbers and other records should be kept for five years. The former chief electoral officer, Mr. Kingsley, suggested 10 years, telling a committee “there’s not much point in keeping it for one year.”

10. Third-party advertising

Outside groups are currently allowed $200,100 in ad spending during an election campaign period. Under the bill, they’ll now be allowed that for anything in “relation” to an election – not just during the campaign itself. This would dramatically reduce the amount groups can spend on political advertising, because the sum outside groups could spend in a campaign – as little as 36 days – would now be applied, theoretically, to a period of four years. Democracy Watch warns it would likely be struck down by a court, but would first put a chill on groups hoping to advertise ahead of the 2015 election, including those intent on advertising against the Conservatives.

Political parties, meanwhile, face no limits on what they can spend on advertising before an election period formally begins.


This all sounds big. How’s it going over?

Not well. Canada’s former chief electoral officer, Jean-Pierre Kingsley, initially gave it a grade of A-, but the response from academics and observers has otherwise largely ranged from concern to flat-out opposition. The bill’s tabling triggered filibustering and early polls have shown that the more people know about it, the less they like it (see this one and this one). The Tories tried to push the act quickly through the House of Commons, suggesting they were in no mood to debate the changes. The NDP tried to force cross-country tours for the committee considering the bill, which was rejected. The NDP have since done their own.

So why is it a big deal?

The bill has a lot of critics. They include a group of Canadian academics and a group of international ones. Canadian student groups have objected to the elimination of vouching and other changes. The international scholars, in particular, warn the bill will not only dilute the strength of Canada’s democracy, but set a poor example for fledgling democracies worldwide.

When would this take effect?

Some of it would kick in as soon as it’s passed, and certainly before the next election, expected in late 2015.


What’s the government’s argument?

That this bill combats voter fraud, includes needed updates to campaign finance laws and, in fact, preserves the investigative power of the Commissioner. We spoke with Mr. Poilievre here. You can find their news release here. Mr. Poilievre also wrote an op-ed here.

What’s The Globe’s position?

The Globe editorial board – a group separate from reporters – was not impressed, and wrote a series of five editorials about the Act and even called for it to be killed altogether.

The five-part series: one, two, three, four and five.


You know, Mr. Poilievre’s right. I really like this idea. What should I do?

You could tell your MP. Find him or her here.


I don’t like this bill. What should I do?

You could tell your MP. Find him or her here.

Has the bill passed yet?

Not yet. It’s in committee after passing second reading. Check on its status here.

I have another question…

E-mail us or tweet at us.


This explainer is written and produced by Josh Wingrove, Chris Hannay, Matt Frehner and Matt Bambach.

 

continue reading source: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/fair-elections-act/article17648947/

 


Our Question(s)

Below you will find an inquiry we submitted to the Globe and Mail Team…

Greetings Josh Wingrove, Chris Hannay, Matt Frehner, Matt Bambach and Globe Investigative Team,

We are writing this “letter” regarding your rather comprehensive summary article “Everything you need to know about the Fair Elections Act” in response to your “I have another question” to inquire about something that has seemingly eluded the press and pundits. This inquiry is specifically targeting the role that the Treasury Board will play with regards to Elections Canada that the Harper Regime has opaquely implemented last fall and is now being ramped up with the Babylonian Budget Implementation Act aka: Bill C-31.

Since this issue may be the greatest of our day, it would seem as if you may have the adequate resources and contacts to address this. Please bear with us and consider taking a few moments to review the following summary articles that we have compiled on our website. Please note that among other resources, we have also uploaded segments of the Fair Elections Act Committee hearings on our ytube as well.

While the voter suppression issue is very troubling and requires great attention, we believe we have found one of the Trojan Horses that is not getting very much attention. This was also addressed in that slide show presentation on scribd a while back. This segment contains some info about the Treasury Board having to approve the hiring. Craig Scott asks the question and David Brock responds at about the 2 min mark. The reasons why this seems odd/important is due to the fact that when we were looking into conflicts of interest re: the use and abuse of social media for campaign fundraising paid for by tax dollars by the Harper Regime, we were referred to the Treasury Dept website. Here is the provision in the the (un)Fair Elections Act. Now, we can’t be very sure how this may tie in, but it seems like the Treasury Board has a bit too much power to change and/or amend many things without consent and the Regime may well be abusing those powers already. That being stated, below you will find introductions and summaries from various sources along with the links. Please keep in mind that we not journalists, we are a collaboration that relies upon many contributors and creative copypasta’ing of commentaries, so bear with our rather crude approach at summarizing but please take this seriously…

Technical assistance

20. (1) The Chief Electoral Officer may engage on a temporary basis the services of persons having technical or specialized knowledge of any matter relating to the Chief Electoral Officer’s work to advise and assist him or her in the exercise or performance of his or her powers, duties and functions under this or any other Act of Parliament and, with the Treasury Board’s approval, may fix and pay those persons’ remuneration and expenses.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fuevldk_PN8&list=PLKm1boxcMsqHzv8s4f2svegffYfqiqYMm

Below you will find brief summaries and links to what we found a while back. Please note that the summary below contains links to three related summaries of interest so they will be posted directly below along with the intro’s. You will also notice that one of your competitors attempted to address this issue on 07Mar2014 and it seems as if the article was subsequently updated 09Mar2014 with some additional tidbits…

“There is a burning question that has been simmering for a bit and one that demands answers before any further attempts by the Conservative Party of Canada, aka: Harper Party, at passing, or shall we say ramming, Minister of Democratic Subversion Pierre Poilievre’s so called Fair Elections Act into legislation.

Is Stephen Harper’s Prime Ministers Office (PMO) subverting and/or violating Elections Canada rules by using taxpayers funds to manage and solicit illegal election donations via social media in preparation for 2015? If so, then another question pops into the equation. Why are the Opposition Parties allowing it to happen and not demanding a Regime change and immediate elections?

This will be a rather short summary primarily consisting of photographic evidence for the visitor to ponder. Below you will find several screen-grabs taken 21 February 2014 of the “official” social media accounts and campaign propaganda donation website that are manged by those kids in short-pants within the PMO. These links were take directly from the following social media pages and lead directly to the Harper Party StephenHarper[dot]ca campaign propaganda website and not the “official” Government of Canada website located at pm.gc.ca. In addition, while researching and archiving back to last summer we noticed that the @pmharper Twitter has also been redirecting visitors to the Conservative[dot]ca website, ConsumersFirst[dot]ca website and cpcconvention[dot]ca website to solicit donations for the Harper Party.”

https://dumpharper.wordpress.com/2014/02/21/is-harpers-pmo-using-taxpayers-to-solicit-cdnpoli-election-donations-via-social-media/

“There are even more burning questions that are ever growing and now expanding into a full blown firestorm and we are now demanding immediate answers and actions before any further attempts by the Conservative Party of Canada, aka: Harper Party, at passing, or shall we say ramming, Minister of Democratic Subversion Pierre Poilievre’s so called Fair Elections Act into legislation.

Once again we must ask ourselves a couple of valid questions and below we will once again utilize Twitter to begin our quest and gather more evidence in support of our initial question and summary Is #Harper’s #PMO using taxpayers $$$ to Solicit #cdnpoli Election Donations via Social Media?

Are Stephen Harper’s appointed Ministers subverting and/or violating Elections Canada rules by using taxpayers funds to manage and solicit illegal election donations via social media in preparation for 2015?

Why are the Opposition Parties allowing it to happen and not demanding a Regime change and immediate elections?

It is worth noting that not all of Harper’s appointed Ministers are engaging in this actively but it seems as if the majority are. In addition there are several Harper Party Ministers that utilize more than on Twitter account and very few of their profile summaries differentiate between the “official” and personal accounts and most contain links to their campaign websites as opposed to the “official Government of Canada website portals. Below, while not all inclusive, we will provide an overview of Tweets and ReTweets as well as utilizing redirection links that are obfuscated via the bit.ly and is.gd short url services.

In addition we are concerned that the government issued devices that we are paying for, such as Blackberry’s, smartphones, computers, laptops and tablets are being utilized for partisan activities, not to mention the time frames in which they are performing these partisan activities is taking away from necessary ministerial functions. In other words, they are campaigning while siphoning off the dole. So basically they are utilizing “company” time while “on the clock” for personal activities, which in the private sector could and usually are grounds for termination or other disciplinary measures. Below you will find examples of questionable conflicts of interest and please note that majority of the archiving was done 21Feb2014 with a few exceptions and that the images contain text archives from the accounts from as far back as possible.”

https://dumpharper.wordpress.com/2014/03/09/are-harpers-ministers-using-taxpayers-to-solicit-cdnpoli-election-donations-via-social-media/

“If you notice the inquiry by FMPsportsguy was specifically delivered to the “Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner” who then replied that the Treasury Board website would be the first point of inquiry. So it seems like it will be up to us to sift through the information that is contained on the Treasury Board website that was referenced above to see what applies. We also have to consider how this campaigning fits within the current Elections Act as well as Pierre Poilievre’s Fair Election Act. For now, here are the links to the page and the sections that seem to apply in this case. It is worth noting that in section n “Policy on the Use of Electronic Networks” was rescinded and replaced by “Policy on Acceptable Network and Device Use” updated 2014-03-06, these links will be posted below”

https://dumpharper.wordpress.com/2014/03/13/is-harpers-pmo-using-taxpayers-to-solicit-cdnpoli-election-donations-via-social-media-ii/

Below you will find several playlists for your convenience and please note that they are segmented and arranged in sequential order…

#FairElectionsAct #BillC23 #cdnpoli #HOC Procedure and House Affairs Committee Debate 13Feb2014 [4 parts]
Featuring Pierre Poilievre and Tom Lukiwski.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKm1boxcMsqF9vTjCNiCk3lqDaCGURMj3

#FairElectionsAct #BillC23 #cdnpoli #HOC Procedure and House Affairs Committee Debate 25Mar2014 [10 parts]
Featuring former chief electoral officer Jean-Pierre Kingsley, Northwest Territories Chief Electoral Officer David Brock and B.C. Chief Electoral Officer Keith Archer.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKm1boxcMsqHzv8s4f2svegffYfqiqYMm

#FairElectionsAct #BillC23 #cdnpoli #HOC Procedure and House Affairs Committee Debate 27Mar2014 [11 parts]
Featuring former B.C. chief electoral officer Harry Neufeld, Samara executive director and co-founder Alison Loat, Fair Vote Canada board member Nathalie Des Rosiers, Institute for Research on Public Policy president Graham Fox, and Civix president Taylor Gunn.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKm1boxcMsqHq0H_3k6RgNzE4Sst-ECc8

#FairElectionsAct #BillC23 #cdnpoli [42 videos]
Compilation of various clips.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKm1boxcMsqFL1UDjYPeqVFniC1uSi8u4

In advance we appreciate your attention to this matter and please note that this “message” has been forwarded to other interested parties and will be posted publicly. Unless redactions are specifically requested, any/all replies will be added as updates to our publicly posted versions for transparency and the public’s right to know.

Thank you for your support,
Canadians Against the Harper Regime Collective Research Collaboration

–This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.–

–Le présent message électronique est confidentiel et peut être couvert par le secret professionnel. Il est à l’usage exclusif du destinataire. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur ou si vous n’en êtes pas le destinataire prévu, vous devez détruire le message et toute pièce jointe ou copie et vous êtes tenu de ne pas conserver, distribuer, divulguer ni utiliser tout renseignement qu’il contient. Veuillez nous informer de toute erreur d’envoi en répondant à ce message. Merci de votre collaboration.–


Below you will find a slightly modified inquiry sent to various national news outlets and other interested parties…

re: Unaddressed Questions about the Fair Elections Act‏

Greetings,

We are writing this “letter” to inquire about something that has seemingly eluded the press and pundits or at least has been overshadowed. This inquiry is specifically targeting the role that the Treasury Board will play with regards to Elections Canada that the Harper Regime has opaquely implemented last fall and is now being ramped up with the Babylonian Budget Implementation Act aka: Bill C-31.

Since this issue may be the greatest of our day, it would seem as if you may have the adequate resources and contacts to address this. Please bear with us and consider taking a few moments to review the following summary articles that we have compiled on our website. Please note that among other resources, we have also uploaded segments of the Fair Elections Act Committee hearings on our ytube as well.

While the voter suppression issue is very troubling and requires great attention, we believe we have found one of the Trojan Horses that is not getting very much attention. This was one of the issues that was also addressed in that slide show presentation on scribd a while back [http://www.scribd.com/doc/211020015/Elections-Canada-proposals-for-Bill-C-23].

Now, we can’t be very sure how this may tie in, but it seems like the Treasury Board has a bit too much power to change and/or amend many things without consent and the Regime may well be abusing those powers already. That being stated, below you will find introductions and summaries from various sources along with the links. Please keep in mind that we not journalists, we are a collaboration that relies upon many contributors and creative copypasta’ing of commentaries, so bear with our rather crude approach at summarizing but please take this seriously. Here is the provision in the the (un)Fair Elections Act that is concerning to us…

Technical assistance

20. (1) The Chief Electoral Officer may engage on a temporary basis the services of persons having technical or specialized knowledge of any matter relating to the Chief Electoral Officer’s work to advise and assist him or her in the exercise or performance of his or her powers, duties and functions under this or any other Act of Parliament and, with the Treasury Board’s approval, may fix and pay those persons’ remuneration and expenses.

This segment contains some info about the Treasury Board having to approve the hiring. Craig Scott asks the question and David Brock responds at about the 2 min mark. The reasons why this seems odd/important is due to the fact that when we were looking into conflicts of interest re: the use and abuse of social media for campaign fundraising paid for by tax dollars by the Harper Regime, we were referred to the Treasury Dept website.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fuevldk_PN8&list=PLKm1boxcMsqHzv8s4f2svegffYfqiqYMm

Below you will find brief summaries and links to what we found a while back. Please note that the summary below contains links to three related summaries of interest so they will be posted directly below along with the intro’s. It is worth noting that one of your competitors attempted to address this issue on 07Mar2014 and it seems as if the article was subsequently updated 09Mar2014 with some additional tidbits…

“There is a burning question that has been simmering for a bit and one that demands answers before any further attempts by the Conservative Party of Canada, aka: Harper Party, at passing, or shall we say ramming, Minister of Democratic Subversion Pierre Poilievre’s so called Fair Elections Act into legislation.

Is Stephen Harper’s Prime Ministers Office (PMO) subverting and/or violating Elections Canada rules by using taxpayers funds to manage and solicit illegal election donations via social media in preparation for 2015? If so, then another question pops into the equation. Why are the Opposition Parties allowing it to happen and not demanding a Regime change and immediate elections?

This will be a rather short summary primarily consisting of photographic evidence for the visitor to ponder. Below you will find several screen-grabs taken 21 February 2014 of the “official” social media accounts and campaign propaganda donation website that are manged by those kids in short-pants within the PMO. These links were take directly from the following social media pages and lead directly to the Harper Party StephenHarper[dot]ca campaign propaganda website and not the “official” Government of Canada website located at pm.gc.ca. In addition, while researching and archiving back to last summer we noticed that the @pmharper Twitter has also been redirecting visitors to the Conservative[dot]ca website, ConsumersFirst[dot]ca website and cpcconvention[dot]ca website to solicit donations for the Harper Party.”

https://dumpharper.wordpress.com/2014/02/21/is-harpers-pmo-using-taxpayers-to-solicit-cdnpoli-election-donations-via-social-media/

“There are even more burning questions that are ever growing and now expanding into a full blown firestorm and we are now demanding immediate answers and actions before any further attempts by the Conservative Party of Canada, aka: Harper Party, at passing, or shall we say ramming, Minister of Democratic Subversion Pierre Poilievre’s so called Fair Elections Act into legislation.

Once again we must ask ourselves a couple of valid questions and below we will once again utilize Twitter to begin our quest and gather more evidence in support of our initial question and summary Is #Harper’s #PMO using taxpayers $$$ to Solicit #cdnpoli Election Donations via Social Media?

Are Stephen Harper’s appointed Ministers subverting and/or violating Elections Canada rules by using taxpayers funds to manage and solicit illegal election donations via social media in preparation for 2015?

Why are the Opposition Parties allowing it to happen and not demanding a Regime change and immediate elections?

It is worth noting that not all of Harper’s appointed Ministers are engaging in this actively but it seems as if the majority are. In addition there are several Harper Party Ministers that utilize more than on Twitter account and very few of their profile summaries differentiate between the “official” and personal accounts and most contain links to their campaign websites as opposed to the “official Government of Canada website portals. Below, while not all inclusive, we will provide an overview of Tweets and ReTweets as well as utilizing redirection links that are obfuscated via the bit.ly and is.gd short url services.

In addition we are concerned that the government issued devices that we are paying for, such as Blackberry’s, smartphones, computers, laptops and tablets are being utilized for partisan activities, not to mention the time frames in which they are performing these partisan activities is taking away from necessary ministerial functions. In other words, they are campaigning while siphoning off the dole. So basically they are utilizing “company” time while “on the clock” for personal activities, which in the private sector could and usually are grounds for termination or other disciplinary measures. Below you will find examples of questionable conflicts of interest and please note that majority of the archiving was done 21Feb2014 with a few exceptions and that the images contain text archives from the accounts from as far back as possible.”

https://dumpharper.wordpress.com/2014/03/09/are-harpers-ministers-using-taxpayers-to-solicit-cdnpoli-election-donations-via-social-media/

“If you notice the inquiry by FMPsportsguy was specifically delivered to the “Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner” who then replied that the Treasury Board website would be the first point of inquiry. So it seems like it will be up to us to sift through the information that is contained on the Treasury Board website that was referenced above to see what applies. We also have to consider how this campaigning fits within the current Elections Act as well as Pierre Poilievre’s Fair Election Act. For now, here are the links to the page and the sections that seem to apply in this case. It is worth noting that in section n “Policy on the Use of Electronic Networks” was rescinded and replaced by “Policy on Acceptable Network and Device Use” updated 2014-03-06, these links will be posted below”

https://dumpharper.wordpress.com/2014/03/13/is-harpers-pmo-using-taxpayers-to-solicit-cdnpoli-election-donations-via-social-media-ii/

Below you will find several playlists for your convenience and please note that they are segmented and arranged in sequential order…

#FairElectionsAct #BillC23 #cdnpoli #HOC Procedure and House Affairs Committee Debate 13Feb2014 [4 parts]
Featuring Pierre Poilievre and Tom Lukiwski.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKm1boxcMsqF9vTjCNiCk3lqDaCGURMj3

#FairElectionsAct #BillC23 #cdnpoli #HOC Procedure and House Affairs Committee Debate 25Mar2014 [10 parts]
Featuring former chief electoral officer Jean-Pierre Kingsley, Northwest Territories Chief Electoral Officer David Brock and B.C. Chief Electoral Officer Keith Archer.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKm1boxcMsqHzv8s4f2svegffYfqiqYMm

#FairElectionsAct #BillC23 #cdnpoli #HOC Procedure and House Affairs Committee Debate 27Mar2014 [11 parts]
Featuring former B.C. chief electoral officer Harry Neufeld, Samara executive director and co-founder Alison Loat, Fair Vote Canada board member Nathalie Des Rosiers, Institute for Research on Public Policy president Graham Fox, and Civix president Taylor Gunn.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKm1boxcMsqHq0H_3k6RgNzE4Sst-ECc8

#FairElectionsAct #BillC23 #cdnpoli [42 videos]
Compilation of various clips.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKm1boxcMsqFL1UDjYPeqVFniC1uSi8u4

In advance we appreciate your attention to this matter and please note that this “message” has been forwarded to other interested parties and will be posted publicly. Unless redactions are specifically requested, any/all replies will be added as updates to our publicly posted versions of this inquiry for transparency and the public’s right to know.

Thank you for your support,
Canadians Against the Harper Regime Collective Research Collaboration

–This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.–

–Le présent message électronique est confidentiel et peut être couvert par le secret professionnel. Il est à l’usage exclusif du destinataire. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur ou si vous n’en êtes pas le destinataire prévu, vous devez détruire le message et toute pièce jointe ou copie et vous êtes tenu de ne pas conserver, distribuer, divulguer ni utiliser tout renseignement qu’il contient. Veuillez nous informer de toute erreur d’envoi en répondant à ce message. Merci de votre collaboration.–

Replies

Below you will find the replies that we have received thus far to our inquiry in the order in which they were received…

From: Craig Scott, M.P. (Toronto-Danforth)
Official Opposition Critic for Democratic Reform
02 April 2014 @ 10:23 AM

Thank you for taking the time to share your concerns regarding Bill C-23, the Conservative Government’s Unfair Elections Act. Please be assured that the NDP is vigorously opposing this bill. I invite you to join our efforts and sign the petition: http://petition.ndp.ca/stand-up-for-canadian-democracy

Last week I put forward an NDP Opposition Day motion to stop the Unfair Elections Act, focusing on measures in this bill that could disenfranchise many Canadians. The motion read as follows: “That, in the opinion of the House, proposed changes to the Elections Act that would prohibit vouching, voter education programming by Elections Canada, and the use of voter cards as identification could disenfranchise many Canadians, particularly first-time voters like youth and new Canadians, Aboriginal Canadians and seniors living in residence, and should be abandoned.” I invite you to read my speech, where I called on my Conservative colleagues to stand up for democracy, here.

You may also be aware that my NDP colleagues and I have been hosting pan-Canadian consultations over the course of the last two weeks to hear from voters and increase awareness about the Unfair Elections Act. I spoke at three of the town halls in Toronto, Ottawa and Dartmouth, and I am pleased to report that they were all full to bursting with people. More and more Canadians are engaged; more and more Canadians are enraged.

As you have pointed out, this proposed legislation will actually make it harder for many Canadians to vote, it muzzles Elections Canada and it gives the Conservative party an unfair advantage. This bill is nothing short of a serious attack on our democracy.

Look no further than C-23’s removal of the right of the Chief Electoral Officer to engage in democracy promotion and general public education. Bill C-23 muzzles Elections Canada by prohibiting the institution from speaking publically about democracy or the importance of voting and from engaging with Canadians through initiatives like the Student Vote Program in schools. During the 2011 election, over 500,000 students across Canada cast mock ballots through the program, an effort designed to encourage them to vote when they turn 18. At a time of record low voter turnout, this change just does not make any sense. You can find a list of their education outreach programs that will be affected on Elections Canada’s website here.

Under Bill C-23, Voter ID cards, issued by Elections Canada, will no longer be accepted. This will make it much harder for students, seniors, aboriginal people, and low-income Canadians to prove their right to vote, and will prevent many thousands of Canadians from voting. That’s on top of the 120,000 Canadians who had a neighbour vouch for them and who will be turned away next election. Conservatives claim that vouching and VICs are the source of widespread fraud, but there is no evidence to support this. Instead, this appears to be a concerted attempt to disenfranchise those with lower incomes or more transient lives with U.S.-style voter suppression tactics.

The bill even bars Elections Canada from conducting electronic-voting pilot projects that might be attractive to younger voters—unless it gets permission from not only the House of Commons but also, wait for it, the unelected Senate – an additional barrier that was not necessary prior to this bill.

The Conservatives also claim that they are taking “big money” out of politics when in fact it creates new ways for “money politics” to skew elections, by raising donation and campaign spending limits as well as creating a huge loophole that allows virtually unlimited campaign spending for purposes of contacting previous donors. Clearly, they are using this bill as a way to try to stack the deck in their favour for the 2015 election, and beyond.

The list of problems goes on. I encourage you to read my longer analysis here (http://craigscott.ndp.ca/the-unfair-elections-act-is-a-con-game). I also invite you to learn more about my efforts to stop this bill, including speeches, media interviews and op-eds, please visit my website: http://craigscott.ndp.ca/news/democratic-reform

Again, thank you for writing. Please be assured that New Democrats will keep up the fight to ensure that Canadians’ voices are heard on a bill so fundamental to democratic voting rights.

Sincerely,

Craig Scott, M.P. (Toronto-Danforth)

Official Opposition Critic for Democratic Reform

Follow me on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/craigscottndp

Follow me on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/craigscottndp


Remember, politics is a contact sport, like hockey, so please feel free to add quick contributions, observations and relevant information as a comment below!

Contact us if you would like to contribute to our collaborative efforts or would like to share/submit articles, data or additional content, feel free to add feedback, additional info, alternative contact details, related links, articles, anonymous submission, etc. as a comment below, via web-form, through social media outlets or email us directly and confidentially at: dumpharper [at] live [dot] ca


This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. and intend its use to be for education and instructional purposes only. Therefore, we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond “fair use,” you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

ShareAlike Statement: https://dumpharper.wordpress.com/sharealike/

CDN Professors Open Letter: Don’t undermine #ElectionsCanada #Harper re #FairElectionsAct #cdnpoli

Don’t undermine Elections Canada

National Post
Tuesday, Mar. 11, 2014

A group of professors explains why the government’s proposed changes to our election laws are a threat to Canada’s democratic traditions

We, the undersigned — professors at Canadian universities who study the principles and institutions of constitutional democracy — believe that the Fair Elections Act (Bill C-23), if passed, would damage the institution at the heart of our country’s democracy: voting in federal elections.

We urge the Government to heed calls for wider consultation in vetting this Bill. While we agree that our electoral system needs some reforms, this Bill contains proposals that would seriously damage the fairness and transparency of federal elections and diminish Canadians’ political participation.

Beyond our specific concerns about the Bill’s provisions (see below), we are alarmed at the lack of due process in drafting the Bill and in rushing it through Parliament. We see no justification for introducing legislation of such pivotal importance to our democracy without significant consultation with Elections Canada, opposition parties, and the public at large.

Voter identification

The Bill proposes to dispense with the use of Voter Information Cards (VICs) as a piece of identification that voters can use (in tandem with another piece of officially recognized ID) to prove their identity and address. The use of voter cards is especially important for Canadians who lack ID that proves their current address, such as students, senior citizens in long-term care facilities, First Nations citizens, and those who have recently moved. Although not perfect, VICs are more likely to provide an accurate address than most other forms of ID, including drivers’ licenses. We believe that the elimination of VICs as a valid form of ID in federal elections would reduce the likelihood of voting by some citizens.

Currently, Elections Canada protects the right to vote of citizens who lack standard forms of identification by allowing them to take an oath affirming their identity, citizenship, and residence in the polling division, and having a qualified voter from the same polling division vouch for their eligibility. In 2011, approximately 120,000 citizens relied on the vouching provision in order to vote. By eliminating vouching, the Fair Elections Act would disenfranchise many of these citizens.

The Government argues that vouching presents an opportunity for voter fraud, citing the Neufeld Report on Compliance Review (which was conducted in response to events that occurred in the Etobicoke Centre riding during the 2011 general election) to the effect that a significant proportion of vouching cases were plagued by “irregularities.” In fact, Elections Canada’s Neufeld Report did not cite a single case of fraudulent or ineligible voting arising from the vouching system. To the contrary, the Report recommended keeping the vouching system in place as a protection for citizens’ right to vote, while working to reduce the need for vouching through enhanced use of the very VICs that Bill C-23 would disqualify.

Ensuring fair elections

We are concerned that Bill C-23 would diminish the ability of Elections Canada to protect the fairness of the electoral process. The Bill proposes to remove the enforcement arm of the agency, headed by the Commissioner of Elections, from Elections Canada and move it to the office of the Director of Public Prosecutions. Crucially, the activities of the Commissioner would no longer be reported to Parliament.

Bizarrely, the Bill forbids Elections Canada from promoting democratic participation. It would even be prevented from publishing reports on the electoral process

The Bill also fails to provide the Commissioner with the powers necessary to properly investigate electoral infractions. For example, the Commissioner will not have the power to compel witness testimony, a major stumbling block during the robocalls investigation. Nor will the Commissioner have the power to require political parties to provide receipts and other documentation about their spending, which makes it impossible to ensure compliance with spending limits. Section 18 would prohibit Elections Canada from communicating with citizens about matters such as the robocalls crisis, thereby reducing democratic transparency and accountability.

Bizarrely, the Bill forbids Elections Canada from promoting democratic participation and voting through “get out the vote” campaigns. Elections Canada would even be prevented from publishing its research reports on the electoral process. This gag on Elections Canada would make Canada an outlier among liberal democracies, instead of the global leader it now is.

Campaign finance

Bill C-23 would make several changes to campaign finance and expense reporting after elections. Taken separately, these changes may seem minor, but together they increase the influence of money in Canadian politics.

The Bill would increase the amount that citizens can donate to a given campaign from $1,200 per calendar year to $1,500 per calendar year; more troubling is the proposed increase in the amount of money an individual can contribute to his or her own campaign from $1,200 to $5,000, creating a bias in favour of those with more personal wealth.

Worse, the Bill distinguishes fundraising from campaigning, and then exempts fundraising costs from campaign spending limits as long as fundraising is targeted at previous donors of more than $20. This introduces two biases into the campaign finance rules. First, it disadvantages parties whose donors can contribute only small amounts. Second, it favours parties that have built their donor lists over those that have not. Parties with longer lists of donors over the threshold could communicate, free of cost to their campaigns, with a larger number of electors than other parties.

Allowing money to influence electoral outcomes stands at stark odds with principles of political equality and democratic fairness. In contrast to our neighbour to the south, Canada has consistently recognized that allowing money into the political arena prevents those without financial backing from being heard and discourages participation when citizens perceive that the playing field of politics tilts toward wealth. This feature of Canadian democracy deserves strong protection, not erosion of the sort introduced by Bill C-23.

Partisans at polling stations

Section 44 of Bill C-23 requires Elections Canada to appoint central poll supervisors from lists of names provided by the candidate or party that came first in the last election, favouring incumbents and their parties. Currently, poll supervisors are appointed by Elections Canada. Their role is to oversee the election in each polling station. Electoral irregularities often are the result of partisan calculations by people working in polling stations. That is why the Neufeld Report suggests that “appointing election officers on any basis other than merit is inconsistent with the principle of administrative neutrality, and contrary to predominant Canadian values [and] established international electoral practices.”

Government officials have responded by pointing out that the Elections Act already allows for candidates and parties to appoint other polling station officers, but this does not provide a reason for expanding, rather than eliminating, a practice that undermines voter confidence in the electoral process.

Elections Canada reports to Parliament, not the government of the day. This is important because the rules governing elections have special significance in a democracy. The legitimacy of the entire political system depends on the fair and impartial administration of electoral procedures. It is vital that the rules of democracy be debated in an open and transparent way, shielded from partisan calculations.

Canadian citizens’ trust in the democratic process relies heavily on Elections Canada as the institution that ensures the fair and impartial administration and enforcement of our electoral laws. Full consideration of its advice and experience is vital to the legitimacy of any major changes to those laws. Especially in view of the sensitive political climate in which allegations of electoral fraud remain unresolved, both prudence and fair play demand that the Bill’s proposed changes to the laws of our democracy receive full parliamentary and public debate.

Signed by:

Monique Deveaux, Professor of Philosophy, University of Guelph

Melissa Williams, Professor of Political Science, University of Toronto

Maxwell Cameron, Professor of Political Science, University of British Columbia

Yasmin Dawood, Assistant Professor of Law, University of Toronto

Patti Tamara Lenard, Assistant Professor, Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, University of Ottawa

Genevieve Fuji Johnson, Associate Professor of Political Science, Simon Fraser University

Arash Abizadeh, Associate Professor of Political Science, McGill University

Yasmeen Abu-Laban, Professor of Political Science, University of Alberta

Cameron Anderson, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Western Ontario

Christopher G. Anderson, Assistant Professor of Political Science, Wilfrid Laurier University

Lesley Andres, Professor of Education, University of British Columbia

Caroline Andrew, Professor, Centre on Governance, University of Ottawa, and Past President, Canadian Political Science Association

Barbara Arneil, Professor of Political Science, University of British Columbia

Yildiz Atasoy, Professor of Sociology, Simon Fraser University

Chloë G. K. Atkins, Associate Professor of Communication and Culture, University of Calgary

Michael Atkinson, Professor, Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy, University of Saskatchewan, and Past President, Canadian Political Science Association

Gerald Baier, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of British Columbia

Ryan Balot, Professor of Political Science and Classics, University of Toronto

Keith Banting, Professor of Political Studies, Queen’s University, and Past President, Canadian Political Science Association

Sylvia Bashevkin, Professor of Political Science, University of Toronto, and Past President, Canadian Political Science Association

Ronald Beiner, Professor of Political Science, University of Toronto

Davina Bhandar, Associate Professor of Canadian Studies, Trent University

Laurence Bheher, Associate Professor of Political Science, Université de Montréal

Antoine Bilodeau, Associate Professor of Political Science, Concordia University

André Blais, Professor of Political Science, Université de Montréal, and Past President, Canadian Political Science Association

Charles Blattberg, Professor of Political Science, Université de Montréal

Pierre Bosset, Professor of Public Law, Université du Québec à Montréal

Sophie Bourgault, Assistant Professor of Political Studies, University of Ottawa

Leah Bradshaw, Professor of Political Science, Brock University

Penny Bryden, Professor of History, University of Victoria

Gillian Calder, Associate Professor of Law, University of Victoria

David Cameron, Professor of Political Science, University of Toronto

Joseph Carens, Professor of Political Science, University of Toronto

Don Carmichael, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Alberta

Paul R. Carr, Associate Professor of Sociology and Interdisciplinary Studies, Lakehead University

R. Kenneth Carty, Professor Emeritus of Political Science, and Past President, Canadian Political Science Association

Julián Castro-Rea, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Alberta

Simone Chambers, Professor of Political Science, University of Toronto

Mary Chapman, Associate Professor of English, University of British Columbia

Ryoa Chung, Associate Professor of Philosophy, Université de Montréal

Colin Coates, Professor of Canadian Studies, York University

Marjorie Griffin Cohen, Professor of Political Science, Simon Fraser University

John Courtney, Professor of Political Science, University of Saskatchewan, and Past President, Canadian Political Science Association

Hugo Cyr, Professor of Political Science and Law, Université du Québec à Montréal

Rita Dhamoon, Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of Victoria

Alexandra Dobrowolsky, Professor of Political Science, Saint Mary’s University

Stefan Dolgert, Assistant Professor of Political Science, Brock University

Mathieu Doucet, Assistant Professor of Philosophy, University of Waterloo

Janique Dubois, Assistant Professor of Political Science, Brock University

Pascale Dufour, Professor of Political Science, Université de Montréal

Avigail Eisenberg, Professor of Political Science, University of Victoria

Lynda Erickson, Professor Emerita of Political Science, Simon Fraser University

Patrick Fafard, Associate Professor, Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, University of Ottawa

Katherine Fierlbeck, Professor of Political Science, Dalhousie University

Craig Forcese, Associate Professor of Law, University of Ottawa

Cristie Ford, Associate Professor of Law, University of British Columbia

Andrea Geiger, Associate Professor of History, Simon Fraser University

Elisabeth Gidengil, Professor of Political Science, McGill University, and Past President, Canadian Political Science Association

Pablo Gilabert, Associate Professor of Philosophy, Concordia University

Elizabeth Goodyear-Grant, Associate Professor Political Studies, Queen’s University

Joyce Green, Professor of Political Science, University of Regina

Rodney Haddow, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Toronto

Blayne Haggart, Assistant Professor of Political Science, Brock University

Marc Hanvelt, Adjunct Research Professor of Political Science, Carleton University

Lois Harder, Professor of Political Science, University of Alberta

Kathryn Harrison, Professor of Political Science, University of British Columbia

Matthew Hayday, Associate Professor of History, University of Guelph

Andrew Heard, Associate Professor of Political Science, Simon Fraser University

Joseph Heath, Professor of Philosophy and School of Public Policy and Governance, University of Toronto

Matthew James, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Victoria

Laura Janara, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of British Columbia

Nancy Janovicek, Associate Professor of History, University of Calgary

Leslie Jeffrey, Professor of History and Politics, University of New Brunswick, Saint John

Candace Johnson, Associate Professor of Political Science, Guelph University

Rebecca Johnson, Professor of Law, University of Victoria

Richard Johnston, Professor of Political Science, and Past President, Canadian Political Science Association

Luc Juillet, Associate Professor, Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, University of Ottawa

Darlene Juschka, Associate Professor of Religious Studies and Women’s Studies, University of Regina

David Kahane, Professor of Political Science, University of Alberta

Willeen Keough, Associate Professor of History, Simon Fraser University

Loren King, Associate Professor of Political Science, Wilfrid Laurier University

Rebecca Kingston, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Toronto

David Laycock, Professor of Political Science, Simon Fraser University

Patrick Leblond, Associate Professor, Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, University of Ottawa

Jean Leclair, Professor of Law, Université de Montréal

Lawrence Leduc, Professor Emeritus of Political Science, University of Toronto

Theresa Lee, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Guelph

Rémi Léger, Assistant Professor of Political Science, Simon Fraser University

Hester Lessard, Professor of Law, University of Victoria

Dominique Leydet, Professor of Philosophy, Université du Québec à Montréal

James Lightbody, Professor of Political Science, University of Alberta

Mary Liston, Assistant Professor of Law, University of British Columbia

Catherine Lu, Associate Professor of Political Science, McGill University

Audrey Macklin, Professor and Chair in Human Rights Law, Faculty of Law, University of Toronto

Colin Macleod, Associate Professor of Philosophy and Law, University of Victoria

Jocelyn Maclure, Professor of Philosophy, Université Laval

Patricia Marino, Associate Professor of Philosophy, University of Waterloo

John McGarry, Professor of Political Science, Queen’s University

Michael McGregor, Assistant Professor of Politics and International Studies, Bishop’s University

Loralea Michaelis, Associate Professor of Politics and International Relations, Mount Allison University

Éric Montpetit, Professor of Political Science, Université de Montréal

Margaret Moore, Professor of Political Studies, Queen’s University

Suzanne Morton, Professor of History and Classical Studies, McGill University

Catherine Murray, Professor of Communication, Simon Fraser University

Christian Nadeau, Associate Professor of Philosophy, Université de Montréal

James Naylor, Associate Professor of History, Brandon University

Jennifer Nedelsky, Professor of Law and Political Science, University of Toronto

Carmen J. Nielson, Associate Professor of History, Mount Royal University

Geneviève Nootens, Professor of Social Sciences, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi

Nancy Olewiler, Professor of Public Policy, Simon Fraser University

Brenda O’Neill, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Calgary

Michael Orsini, Associate Professor of Political Studies, University of Ottawa

Martin Papillon, Associate Professor of Political Studies, University of Ottawa

Steve Patten, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Alberta

Omid Payrow Shabani, Professor of Philosophy, University of Guelph

Dennis Pilon, Associate Professor of Political Science, York University

Florence Piron, Professor of Information and Communication, Université Laval

Pablo Policzer, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Calgary

Philip Resnick, Professor Emeritus of Political Science, University of British Columbia

Kent Roach, Professor of Law, University of Toronto

Douglas A. Ross, Professor of Political Science, Simon Fraser University

Jason Roy, Assistant Professor of Political Science, Wilfrid Laurier University

Claudia Ruitenberg, Associate Professor of Educational Studies, University of British Columbia

Peter Russell, Professor Emeritus of Political Science, University of Toronto, and Past President, Canadian Political Science Association

Paul Saurette, Associate Professor of Political Studies, University of Ottawa

Carol Schick, Associate Professor of Education, University of Regina

David Schneiderman, Professor of Law, University of Toronto

Christa Scholtz, Associate Professor of Political Science, McGill University

Richard Schultz, Professor of Political Science, McGill University

Leslie Seidle, research director, Institute for Research on Public Policy

Ozlem Sensoy, Associate Professor of Education, Simon Fraser University

Grace Skogstad, Professor of Political Science, and Past President, Canadian Political Science Association

Harry Smalier, Associate Professor Emeritus, Faculty of Education, York University

David E. Smith, Distinguished Visiting Professor, Department of Politics and Public Administration, Ryerson University, and Past President, Canadian Political Science Association

Jennifer Smith, Professor Emerita of Political Science, Dalhousie University

Miriam Smith, Professor of Law and Society, York University, and Past President, Canadian Political Science Association

Patrick Smith, Professor of Political Science, Simon Fraser University

Robert Sparling, Assistant Professor of Political Science, Université de Montréal

Mark Spooner, Associate Professor, Faculty of Education, University of Regina

Maxime St-Hilaire, Assistant Professor of Law, Université de Sherbrooke

Christine Straehle, Associate Professor, Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, University of Ottawa

Veronica Strong-Boag, Professor Emerita, Institute for Gender, Race, Sexuality and Social Justice/Educational Studies, University of British Columbia, and Past President, Canadian Historical

Association

Lisa Taylor, Professor of Education, Bishop’s University

Melanee Thomas, Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of Calgary

Reeta Tremblay, Professor of Political Science, University of Victoria, and Past President, Canadian Political Science Association

James Tully, Distinguished Professor of Political Science, Law, Indigenous Governance and Philosophy, University of Victoria

Luc Turgeon, Assistant Professor of Political Studies, University of Ottawa

Patrick Turmel, Associate Professor of Philosophy, Université Laval

Ian Urquhart, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Alberta

Robert Vipond, Professor of Political Science, University of Toronto

Jennifer Wallner, Assistant Professor of Political Studies, University of Ottawa

Jeremy Webber, Dean of Law, University of Victoria

Mark Warren, Professor of Political Science, University of British Columbia

Lorraine E. Weinrib, Professor of Law, University of Toronto

Daniel Weinstock, Professor of Law, McGill University

Steven Weldon, Associate Professor of Political Science, Simon Fraser University

Graham White, Professor of Political Science, University of Toronto at Mississauga, and Past President, Canadian Political Science Association

Lisa Young, Professor of Political Science, University of Calgary

Margot Young, Professor of Law, University of British Columbia

Robert Young, Professor of Political Science, University of Western Ontario, and Past President, Canadian Political Science Association

National Post
More on this Story


Related:

Is #Harper’s #PMO using taxpayers $$$ to Solicit #cdnpoli Election Donations via Social Media?

Are #Harper’s Ministers using taxpayers $$$ to Solicit #cdnpoli Election Donations via Social Media?


continue reading source: http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2014/03/10/mcgregor-anderson-how-the-fair-elections-act-might-actually-hurt-the-tories-in-2015/


Remember, politics is a contact sport, like hockey, so please feel free to add quick contributions, observations and relevant information as a comment below!

Contact us if you would like to contribute to our collaborative efforts or would like to share/submit articles, data or additional content, feel free to add feedback, additional info, alternative contact details, related links, articles, anonymous submission, etc. as a comment below, via web-form, through social media outlets or email us directly and confidentially at: dumpharper [at] live [dot] ca


This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. and intend its use to be for education and instructional purposes only. Therefore, we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond “fair use,” you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

ShareAlike Statement: https://dumpharper.wordpress.com/sharealike/

#UpInSmoke: #Harper’s #CPC and #Ford’s #FordNation Ideological Subversion of #cdnpoli #senca

It seems as if “We the People” have found ourselves in quite a predicament and the implications are far reaching. Does the cost of “power” consolidation to an “individual” include servitude to foreign investment schemes that can simply “buy” that one individuals influence? Is Canada simply “closed” for “face to face” business domestically so that it may be politically “sold” to the highest faceless international bidders in a globalized fire sale? Why are the seemingly exponential and expanding connections to organized criminal activity and undue influence within the halls of Government being allowed?

PM Harper’s houses of disrepute By Paul E Kennedy — National Newswatch — Nov 19 2013
“The Prime Minister bears responsibility for having brought the two Houses of Parliament to their knees and turned them into houses of disrepute. This situation could only have come to pass because government MPs and Senators have placed narrow partisan interests and blind loyalty to the leader of the day before their responsibility to the people of Canada and the ideals of justice and democracy.”

The real problem now lies with how the various media conglomerates and social media outlets decide to continue spinning lies to divert our collective eyes from the ultimate prize. Surely another riddle or question to ponder is not the option but another perspective and direction is desperately needed. Somehow we need to force the narrative towards and away from the clown prince of the neo-conservative movement since their ultra-far-right agenda is forging ahead behind this 3 ring circus that they have spent billions of our tax dollars to create. They are collectively proving themselves to be the both sides of the “wars” they have waged in our collective names and successfully downloaded the costs to us. As a refresher, below are the fundamental “sales pitches” of the international ultra-right-wing investor to acquire our tax dollars:

  1. War on Crime
  2. War on Drugs
  3. War on Terror

Now is the time for the collective will of “We the People”, the true majority, to set aside our seemingly petty disagreements and understand our adversaries adversary and their tactics. The fact that the Harper Regime has not tossed Rob Ford under the bus is due to the fact that they desperately need the Ford Nation to pursue their mandate. This will prove to be self-defeating as they have lost all control and need the drunken buffoonery to continue and could care less of the well being of Rob Ford but certainly do NOT care about his wife, children, family or friends. They are proving themselves to be the greedy malcontents that they really are by fueling the criminal side by way of the subversion of the Constitution and Charter to their own needs.

“We the People” need to oxidize their narrative, cut off their funds and smoke ’em outta their caves by simply reviewing and investigating further, in no specific order, a few points that are glaringly missing in the media reporting these days which stifles it’s growth via social media:

  • PMO Scandal(s) – Investigations into Frauds upon the Government, Breach of Trust, Conspiracy, Blackmail, etc.
  • Aboriginal, Indigenous and First Nations – Education, health care, missing women, treaty rights, human rights, land rights, resource development rights, international investor involvement in illegal police state measures.
  • Senate Scandal(s) – In addition to attempts to prevent representative and truly transparent reform, once the Supreme Court Justices began pondering and questioning the future implications of the potential for a potentially undemocratically elected majority caucus to create the conditions for a dictatorship, everyone shut the story down.
  • National Security – Missing millions from border security and community resources, PMO compromised, Rob Ford compromised, Foreign Policy, selective investment in Human Rights at home and abroad.
  • Robocalls Scandal(s) – Puzzling, but hey, due process usually catches up with reality after the next election cycle.
  • CETA – Skimpy draft text presentation is unacceptable at best, not to mention it conflicts with NAFTA and other agreements with the US.
  • TPP – Having to wait for “Anonymous” sources and WikiLeaks for leaked drafts of secret long term “trade” agreements that affect everyone is criminal.
  • Electronic Surveillance – As other Nation and States seem to be taking proactive responses to at least pacify the citizenry, having to wait for “Anonymous” sources and Snowden for details is ridiculous.
  • Crime, Punishment, Immigration and Detention – Selective systems rife with corruption and abuse. Unconstitutional omnibus legislation, horrific conditions within the prison systems, overburdened court systems, under representation of the detained, expanded police powers, out-sourcing and privatizing detention services.
  • Currency Wars and Trade Wars – Setting the pretext and domestic conditions to assure that the “budget plan” gets interrupted by global “economic” conditions. Easily done by way of an over valued dollar that encourages quick short term, low to no interest foreign investment in the housing, financial and resource extraction bubbles at the expense of the tourism and export sectors.
  • Tax Evasion Haven – Been a while since we have explore offshore but this ties into the Economic Extraction Action Plan. More appropriately summarized as the Plan of Action to Extract as much liquidity out of the Canadian economy as possible before the inevitable bursting of the bubbles.
  • Veterans Issues – Lest we forget…

Now, getting back to the familiar and failing narrative, the diversion that is Rob Ford, who actually defines the neo-conservative caucus by way of accurate representation. Just take a peek Stateside and look into the crowds that comprise Koch Nation by way of the ultra-right-wing elements of the neo-conservative Tea Party movement. You’ll notice the same divide between “traditional” conservative values and “ideological” values cloaked within the conservative context.

One may wonder what, or why, or how, any of these issues could converge and/or be interconnected and why the thought is never allowed to cross their minds that “Stephen Harper” may not have the best long term interests in “his” mind for Canada. Now how many times “he” get’s caught up in “his” own lies, his caucus seems blinded to what is occurring before their collective eyes. But then again any good conman, crook or criminal knows that for the most part, the most obvious is always the least obvious. This is where the msm narrative needs to be injected with some facts that they are careful to mention in passing but not fully explore. No matter how hard they try, proper chronological documentation elsewhere will assure that facts will not die.

The fact remains that a small minority of ideological internationalist ultra-neo-conservative loyalists have convinced the majority of  persons with “conservative values” that in order to “win” an election they need the ultra-right-wing Reform/Alliance members led by Stephen Harper. To this end to “win” an election and an eventual majority to govern with authority, they became willingly subservient to the whims of a “leader” without having to admit they have enslaved themselves to a “master” that is controlled by international investors that do not have a vested interest in Canada.

 


Remember, politics is a contact sport, like hockey, so please feel free to add quick contributions, observations and relevant information as a comment below!

Contact us if you would like to contribute to our collaborative efforts or would like to share/submit articles, data or additional content, feel free to add feedback, additional info, alternative contact details, related links, articles, anonymous submission, etc. as a comment below, via web-form, through social media outlets or email us directly and confidentially at: dumpharper [at] live [dot] ca


This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. and intend its use to be for education and instructional purposes only. Therefore, we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond “fair use,” you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

ShareAlike Statement: https://dumpharper.wordpress.com/sharealike/

ATTN: @pmharper + #CPC re: #FirstNations + #Aboriginals + #ReconciliationActionPlan = #cdnpoli #NurembergSolution

Before this gets outta hand it may be time to begin the act of reconciliation in Canada NOW, as opposed to delivering empty apologies. Here is what may be a simple initial solution that may, possible, potentially, maybe, kinda, sorta acceptable, if you are lucky. while that simmers a bit, we utilized a hashtagged tweetable title to remind ya when we share this article around the interwebs, so be sure to have Harper’s Kiddies lots o’ RedBull and other keep awake and alert remedies. Continue reading ATTN: @pmharper + #CPC re: #FirstNations + #Aboriginals + #ReconciliationActionPlan = #cdnpoli #NurembergSolution

Fixing Elections Through Fraud

Commission on Electoral Practices in Canada
by Anthony J. Hall

The declining credibility of elections in many countries is creating a crisis of legitimacy severing bonds of trust that once linked citizens to the institutions that govern us. Without credible proof that those governing on our behalf really have earned our supportive consent in free and fair elections, one of humanity’s greatest innovations is rendered null and void.

The implications of this breakdown put in doubt one of the West’s premier claims, namely that its core polities are beacons of democracy worthy of emulation. The democratic deficit arising from episodes of electoral malfeasance makes a mockery of the West’s frequent assertions that its expansionary enterprises are benign efforts to spread the benefits of governance through voter choice rather than the armed impositions of autocrats.

As shall be established in the main body of this essay, the presidential elections of 2000 and 2004 in the United States are both textbook examples of systemic fraud that ushered into power the losing candidate. Many of the tactics for cheating developed primarily on the right wing of the political spectrum in the United States are being broadly exported. The evidence is mounting, for instance, that the unfolding controversy over the conduct and outcome of the 2011 federal election in Canada involves violations of the law by operatives who seem to have moved easily between the orbit of the Republican Party in the United States and the orbit of the Conservative Party in Canada.

The importation into Canada of Republican Party tactics for stealing votes and elections is an extension of a very old process that has seen the constitutional monarchy in the northern half of North America assimilated more and more into the political culture of the republic to the south. This process of assimilation tends to wreak havoc on Canada’s institutions of parliamentary democracy derived primarily from the Westminster Parliament in Great Britain.

As the leadership of the ruling Conservative Party of Canada looks more and more to the right-wing of the political spectrum in the United States for models of how to win and maintain power, the integrity of Canada’s own indigenous institutions of self-governance is increasingly imperiled. The assault on the indigenous conservatism inherited from the era of the civil war in British North America has been particularly brutal. Recall that Canada emerged from the conservative side of the conflict remembered in history as the American Revolution. The protests in Boston Harbor against the taxation of East India Company tea were a liberal attack on the conservatism of the British imperial red coats who are the founding fathers of my country, the polity that would in due course become the coast-to-coast-to-coast Dominion of Canada.

continue reading: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/04/05/fixing-elections-through-fraud/


Please feel free to add feedback, additional info, alternative contact details, related links, articles, anonymous submission, etc. as a comment below, via web-form, through social media or mail us directly and confidentially at: dumpharper [at] live [dot] ca


This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. and intend its use to be for education and instructional purposes only. Therefore, we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond “fair use,” you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

ShareAlike Statement: https://dumpharper.wordpress.com/sharealike/

Stephen Harper Wants to Bury Election Fraud

Just when you thought they couldn’t sink any lower the Stephen Harper Party plumbs new depths in… being the Stephen Harper Party.

Why does the Harper Party dominated committee want to see the Chief Electoral Officer on Budget Day? Maybe because most of the Press will be in lockdown until after the Budget is read?

Is this a new way to muzzle the Media?

If this type of tomfoolery and chicanery were to have occurred when Lord Stephen sat in Opposition he would be calling for heads to roll, for Commissions of the Royal sort to be called.

Mr. Mulcair! Mr. Rae! Gentlemen, rev up your chainsaws!

Canadians want Harper’s head on a platter!

The fact that the Stephen Harper Party finds the robocall and other election improprieties a laughing matter and tries to pooh-pooh it away is bad enough but now to schedule the appearance of the Chief Electoral Officer before committee on Budget Day is abhorrent.

Harper may like to paint this as a minor left wing Eastern to-do, but the fact of the matter is that it is not only NDP and Liberal support calling for a full and proper investigation into this matter… it is the Conservatives too.

Not your “Harper People”, the sad little echo boxes that parrot whatever the party says.

Not your Harper MPs that can only speak when party leadership puts words in their mouths and their hands up their backside.

The True Conservatives that believe in Canada and Canadians and not Chinese and American oil barons.

They are rallying to our flag. The flag of Canadians.

You’ve forgotten your so called Reform roots. Democracy from the Grassroots is no more, if it ever was.

You’ve shown us your disdain for Democracy in your handling of the Canadian Wheat Board. This is a farmer organization, owned and governed by its members. You chose to overrule them, to write a law that will be before the courts likely for years.

The clowning and joking of the Stephen Harper Party over this current election scandal speaks volumes to me and millions of other Canadians.

This Electoral Fraud needs to be investigated, and those involved brought to justice.

Your obvious lack of interest of finding the culprits makes me wonder who they really are. Do you shake their hands when they come into your office each morning? Do they call you “Sir”?

The facts I’ve seen, the reports I’ve heard all point to the involvement of your party, the Stephen Harper Party.

The information required to contact and misdirect non supporters of your party is not available to the general public. It is not available to front line campaign staff. The release of this information to persons unknown could only have occurred if people well up the food chain in the Harper Party organization released it. Perhaps it was the “master strategist” himself.

To the Media: My challenge to you is to ensure that for each scribe you send to cover the Budget, you send one to cover the committee. Canada wants to know what the Chief Electoral Officer has to say.

If the Harper Party opts to move the meeting in camera, we want to know who moved it and who supported it.

To the Leaders on the Opposition Side of the House, Mr. Mulcair and Mr. Rae: My challenge to you is to call the Harper Party to account for their part in this and other Election Irregularities that occurred in the latest elections.

I leave it to you and the members of the Opposition Side to force a proper inquiry into these instances of Electoral Fraud and challenge for a Royal Commission to get to the bottom of this.

Not only for me, one Canadian…

Not only for those millions of Canadians who believe as I do that this needs to be addressed…

But also for the boys who lie in Flanders and Bergen Op Zoom and all the other military cemeteries and for the members of our Forces that came home but never saw their loved ones again…

Let Stephen Harper know that when he steps on Democracy he spits on the memory of those who fought to protect Democracy around the world.

Cons Made 6 Million Election Calls, Refuse To Hand Over Call Records For Investigation

Cons Made 6 Million Election Calls, Refuse To Hand Over Call Records For Investigation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5tkPBysJQY

Website: http://www.NewElectionNow.ca/

National Day of Action Across Canada, phase 2: March 31, 2012
http://www.facebook.com/events/388129707864596/

Investigating their own tapes before elections canada or the rcmp? Election call tapes under review by Conservatives Investigators planning to interview staff at call centre http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2012/03/01/pol-robocalls-elections-canada.html

Misleading election call traced to Conservatives
source: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2012/03/01/bc-suspicious-election-calls-dimond.html

RMG (Responsive Marketing Group) clients – 2011 election
Full list of expenses (($15,000.01 per client))
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/inside-politics-blog/2012/02/robocalls-watch-conservative-party-linked-to-calls-directing-voters-to-different-polling-stations.html

***Robo-calls worse than Watergate***
source: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/british-columbia/rod-mickleburgh/robo-calls-worse-than-watergate-dirty-tricks-op-opines/article2356142/

***Election Fraud promoted at conservative campaign school***
source: http://ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/canada-politics/uvic-professor-claims-voter-suppression-promoted-conservative-campaign-005940775.html

A slew of former employees at a call centre in Thunder Bay, Ont., revealed on Monday they were using a script to make live calls on behalf of the Conservative party direction voters to goto wrong polling stations.
source: http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/02/28/robocalls-probe-centres-on-disposable-burner-cellphone-linked-to-guelph-black-ops/

Elections Canada confirms over 31,000 complaints in RoboCall Scandal
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGuB5GzfJOI

Harper ignores opposition calls for by-elections in ridings hit by robo-calls
source: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-notebook/harper-ignores-opposition-calls-for-by-elections-in-ridings-hit-by-robo-calls/article2351508/

Stephen Harper says Election Fraud in 57 Ridings is a “Smear Campaign” and is a Lie? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYYikT1WWV8

Measuring the impact of robocalls in the 57 ridings allegedly targeted
source: http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/02/28/robocall-ridings/

cbc news: photo posted to Facebook by (Robocalls) RackNine CEO Matt Meier, in which he noted that “government does pay”
source: http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/inside-politics-blog/2012/02/order-paper-watch-ndp-wants-info-on-government-money-going-to-racknine-rmg-and-campaign-research.html

Link Between Racknine President Matt Meier and the Harper Government , personal facebook photos of Racknine President Matt Meier released.
source: http://thecanadianpoliticalscene.blogspot.com/2012/02/ndp-leaks-more-links-between-racknine.html

First election scandal casualty: Democracy
source: http://www.torontosun.com/2012/02/27/first-election-scandal-casualty-democracy

February 27th 2012- The word is “script.” And we’re not talking about the Oscars here. source: http://thestar.blogs.com/politics/2012/02/script.html

February 27th 2012- “I made misleading election calls for the Tories: Call centre workers speak out.” source: http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/02/27/i-made-misleading-election-calls-for-the-tories-call-centre-workers-speak-out/

February 27th 2012- CBC News- Robocalls : **Confirmed** Conservative Party linked to calls directing voters to different polling stations.http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/inside-politics-blog/2012/02/robocalls-watch-conservative-party-linked-to-calls-directing-voters-to-different-polling-stations.html

February 27th 2012
Conservative scripts misdirected voters in 2011 election, say call centre
source: http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/1137273–conservative-scripts-misdirected-voters-in-2011-election-say-call-centre-staff

The Conservatives won their majority with 166 seats. That’s a margin of 11. That means the legitimacy of the Tory majority is in question. It’s simple math.
source: http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Tandt+Investigation+into+robocalls+sc%C2%ADandal+must+public+biased/6212272/story.html

Stephen Harper, Jason Kenney, Rona Ambrose and Tim Uppal amongst those whose campaigns paid for RackNine’s auto-dial services.
source: http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/inside-politics-blog/2012/02/election-robocall-data-dump—12-conservative-candidates-on-the-2011-racknine-client-list.html

Misleading election campaign robocalls linked to company that worked for Conservatives source: http://ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/canada-politics/misleading-election-campaign-robo-calls-linked-company-worked-174209326.html

Uploaded by TheSecretStore on Mar 25, 2012
https://www.youtube.com/user/TheSecretStore
Category: News & Politics
Tags: www.NewElectionNow.ca National Day of Action 6 million phone calls 6 million election calls Elections Canada 2011 Election RoboCalls Election Fraud con-job conseratives Stephen Harper Dean Del Mastro RackNine RMG Harper Regime Dirty Tricks 2011 Election Fraud Scandal
License: Standard YouTube License

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5tkPBysJQY


Please feel free to add feedback, additional info, alternative contact details, related links, articles, anonymous submission, etc. as a comment below, via web-form, through social media or mail us directly and confidentially at: dumpharper [at] live [dot] ca


This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. and intend its use to be for education and instructional purposes only. Therefore, we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond “fair use,” you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

ShareAlike Statement: https://dumpharper.wordpress.com/sharealike/

I’m not “Harper People”… Do I get an Attack Ad too?

I was going to write about Bob Rae and the Harper Party attack ads but I got side tracked.

There was a bit on the news about Harper’s trip to Asia and how Canada was going to be open for business when it came to Asia.

He was talking oil.

He said it would be clear when the budget came down.

I’m not a gambler but I’d be willing to wager that a certain politician is about to ram his pipeline into B.C.’s interior and say it’s necessary for Canada’s Financial Interests.

Canada is getting a lot smaller, there are only two groups… the Pro Harperistas and everyone else.

If you stand against the Harper Party you get half truths and innuendos up the wazoo. Ask Bob Rae, he’s been marked by the Dark Lord as his inequal and is open to the Harper Propaganda Machine’s hate messaging system.

Using half truths and sound bites the Harperistas are trying to make Bob Rae look like the most incompetent Premier in Ontario’s history. Actually Rae did a pretty savvy job of steering a world class economy through a recession with no help from his Federal counterparts, the Mulroney PCs.

Compare that to Harper’s record on the economy and his dealings with the recession. When Rae got through Ontario was ready for business, Harper still whines and pules about how fragile the economy is even if we have supposedly recovered.

Then there was Thomas Mulcair who was merely a candidate for the leadership of the NDP and we got leaked stories about how he approached Harper to run for the Stephen Harper Party but he wanted to be a front row Cabinet Minister. Harper allegedly turned him down because he was greedy…

Thomas Mulcair was a free agent and a well know Quebec politician and talked with both the Federal Liberals and the NDP. Harper would have given his eye teeth to pull Mulcair into his circle. Imagine having Mulcair as his Quebec Lieutenant rather than having to appoint a Senator who wasn’t even from Quebec at the time to sit in his Caucus as the Quebec representative.

The Harperistas were trying to poison the NDP against Mulcair… didn’t work.

Congratulations Thomas Mulcair on your successful leadership bid for the New Democrats!

I understand Bob Rae sent a nice note of congratulations to Mr. Mulcair, Stephen Harper’s Team sent one too, accusing him of being a tax and spend socialist or something of that sort.

Class act Stephen, the ads start tomorrow right? [Edit apparently they start Monday]

When it comes to aboriginal relations, Harper seems to like the natives, when they wear their fancy Indian clothes and make him an honorary chief or sit with him in the high class box at the Olympics. When they are polite and don’t ask for much.

Contrast that when the Harper Party was shocked and amazed by the squalor that the people of Attawapiskat were living in. When they asked for help (by declaring a state of emergency) the Harper Party berated them for being wasteful, smearing them and accusing them of mismanagement of their Native allowance.

This is the same community whose children went all the way to the United Nations to beg for money to have a proper school in their community.

Not long ago an Inuit boy died while travelling from his grandmother’s house to his home on a snowmobile.

When he was overdue, a search was organized and National Defence was contacted to assist. They declined.

They said the weather was too bad for their helicopters. It was not.

They said they have a “call back” policy where the searchers have to call them again before they can act. The policy does not exist.

Turns out there were no helicopters available, they were down for service, both of them.

Apparently Stephen Harper would rather give tax breaks to big oil than ensure the safety of Canadians by ensuring we have adequate search and rescue available at all times.

In Stephen Harper’s world, a Cabinet Minister can lie to the House of Commons, be found in contempt of the House of Commons, and still get a promotion.

In Stephen Harper’s world, a Cabinet Minister can misappropriate money for pet projects and still get a promotion.

In Stephen Harper’s world, a Cabinet Minister can have an affair with a subordinate and still get a promotion.

In the real world these acts would get you terminated and possibly tossed in jail.

In Stephen Harper’s world, those who do not want a pipeline full of bitumen run through their back yards are not allowed to have experts talk on their behalf. Those experts are banished because they are interfering foreigners attempting to damage Canada’s economy. Take that Sierra Club, you bunch of hooligans.

But the other interfering foreigners, the oil companies, are allowed to argue in favour of running the muck through your back yard.

But then again, they’re “Harper People”.

But the thing these “Harper People” need to keep in mind, you are only “Harper People” as long as you are useful to him.

Ask the grain farmers who are fighting to retain the Canadian Wheat Board.

He got your votes and now he gets his way.

Trudeau called MPs pawns. Harper has made them Marionettes. They can only speak when Harper puts words in their mouths.

You and me? We are only important for one month every four years or so.

The smears and attack ads are just his way of telling you how to vote, so you can be “Harper People” too.

The Stephen Harper Party Vs. Democracy

Stephen Harper, you just doesn’t get it do you?

People have fought and people have died for democracy in every land around the world except possibly Antarctica.

Canadians serving in our forces have travelled to far off countries to help in the fight to achieve democracy for other people.

Canadians as private citizens have travelled to other countries to help ensure that their elections are properly done and the peoples of those lands were able to take part in fair and free elections.

Canadians believe in freedom. Canadians have risked their lives for freedom. Canadians have died for freedom.

Free and Fair Elections are the cornerstone of freedom, and Canadians are concerned that we may no longer have Free and Fair Elections.

When Elections Canada approached the Procedure and House Affairs Committee for increased investigative powers, it was your people, the members of the Stephen Harper Party that said “No”.

This request or rather recommendation was part of the Elections Canada Report on the 2008 General Election. These reports follow every General Election. I do not know if Increased Powers of Investigation was included in past reports but it certainly seems to be a good idea.

The Provinces already do this, why not the Nation?

In the past General Election of 2011 we have seen reports of automated “robocalls” claiming to be from Elections Canada directing people to wrong and nonexistent Polling Stations. We have seen reports of incomplete Voter Registration cards and now we are hearing about undisclosed bank accounts and “third party” agents hiring services for campaigns and being reimbursed for these expenses rather than those campaigns paying for the services directly.

This all looks less than above board to me. How about you?

I understand that you have a Party Lawyer investigating these claims internally.

I have a simple question for you. Would you have accepted an internal investigation of the “Sponsorship Scandal” done by the Liberals? Should we accept your internal investigation any more than you would have accepted theirs?

You claim to be the “Law and Order” Party, it’s time you acted like it.

Grant the powers requested by Elections Canada and make it law. Not in six months’ time in a nonbinding private member’s motion, in a real law now.

Give Elections Canada unfettered access to the information they need to see and do not cause any interruption of this investigation and do not use your position to try and influence the investigation.

I am willing to give Elections Canada the time to do their investigation, but only if it is done without interference from the government.

If they recommend a Royal Commission, I expect you to make that happen as quickly as possible.

If Elections Canada chooses to lay charges against individuals or organizations as a result of their investigations I expect you to allow the cases to proceed without interference.

The bedrock on which a democracy is built is the ability of citizens to participate in free elections. Any attempt to block a citizen from voting is an attack on democracy. Marking an X on a ballot is for most people the only time they get a chance to influence the government. Help us to ensure that no Canadian is denied their voice.

One of your supporters told me that if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear.

Will you join with us or have you something to fear?

Who is Rick McKnight?

Below you will find a rather unique peek behind the complex web that weaves the veils of secrecy that lie between special interests and government. Some prefer to follow the money, while others prefer to follow the digital footprints. Here are a few of the steps taken along the way during the quest trough the tar sands seeking Rick McKnight…

Ok friends, here we go. Upon further review, it is becoming apparent that Matt Meier has basically mislead and lied to the Globe and Mail.

“There is absolutely nothing to hide with RackNine,” Mr. Meier said. “… Five minutes searching on Google easily demonstrates that there is no hidden story beyond a hard working, honest person.”

The story that Rick McKnight is “Pierre Poutine” and is also Rafael Martinez Minuesa is a fabrication at best. If RackNine is now lying to the media it would appear as if they have something to hide. If this is the case than Elections Canada and the RCMP need to expand their investigations and NOW!

Simply put, searching g**gle for 5 minutes as Matt Meier has suggested, will NOT connect Rafael Martinez Minuesa to RackNine and neither will visiting his f***book profile, his y**tube account nor his many websites.

There is ample evidence that suggests that Rafael Martinez Minuesa is NOT the Rick McKnight that is on f***book nor the admin of the Rick McKnight “fan” page. The 2 profiles have posted from different locations geographically on multiple occasions at the same times. Not only that but neither “profile” contains any corroborating evidence that they are indeed the same individual.

The time has come for ALL citizen journalists to blow the lid off this caper. We need to get all of this data and evidence compiled and submitted to as many individuals, media outlets and non-neocon MP’s by the end of this week. If they will not cooperate with “We the People” then we shall seek out those that can and will and expose them for collusion…
Firm at centre of robo-call storm unmasks mystery employee:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-notebook/firm-at-centre-of-robo-call-storm-unmasks-mystery-employee/article2375881/

——————————————————–

  • anon: RackNine continues to dig their own grave, looks awfully sweet but smells awfuly bad.
  • anon: “I’ve been working for RackNine for over two years as a lead developer creating web sites, and working with social media,” the staffer said. “I do exist. Attached are a recent photo and a copy of my European Union driver’s license.”

    wtf – This guy is some hot shot website developer that works with social media and he decides to release that grainy, fuzzy picture?? What a joke!

  • anon: https://www.facebook.com/rafael.minuesa

    Rafael Martinez Minuesa

  • anon: The article states it is a photo from his EU drivers license and the rather interesting part is that he is located overseas and more than likely will be immune to prosecution and unavailable to be brought before an investigative committee. But hey, he said he didn’t do anything wrong so the Harper Regime will back him, since we know they never do anything wrong…
  • anon: From his FB wall.

    “RECENT ACTIVITY

    Rafael changed his profile picture.”

  • anon: This is even more suspicious!
  • anon: I took a screen clip. 🙂
  • anon: Decided to bomb around through some of his “sites” and he seems to be well versed in data mining activities…
  • anon: https://plus.google.com/106037213559088366239/posts

    Rick McKnight – Google+

    plus.google.com Rick McKnight – Web Developer at RackNine – Internet – RackNine – Edmonton – Web…

  • anon: So Ralph is a Graphic Designer, turned Web Designer, turned Web Developer. Ya think he would want a better picture of himself for his FB profile and release to the press. And btw I don’t think that picture is from his driver’s license, unless they use ugly flowered shower curtains (or whatever that is) for back drops on EU license photos. 🙂

    “Mr. Minuesa issued a statement as well as a picture and identification Tuesday in an effort to corroborate his identity.

    “I’ve been working for RackNine for over two years as a lead developer creating web sites, and working with social media,” the staffer said. “I do exist. Attached are a recent photo and a copy of my European Union driver’s license.”

  • anon: Maybe that is the EU robo-licence?
  • anon: haha 🙂
  • anon: I have to say after checking around a bit on this guy Rafael – he sure doesn’t jive up with our Mr. McKnight and all his influential Cons and right wing FB friends. Just saying….
  • anon: I tend to agree anon:, this story is definitely fishy and only seems to add up using neocon mathematics…
  • anon: It would seem that either his f***book profile or one of his several websites would list his work and/or affiliation RackNine somewhere in the mix. Why would a developer leave out a high value company in his online resume?
  • anon: Ya neocon mathematics, that must be it. 🙂 I think this stinks to the high heavens. I think Alan is probably right that the knight is a Meier.
  • anon: Ya I couldn’t find any reference to rack 9 either. You would think he might have some clips of his web design there. If that is what he was doing.
  • anon: I need some more info about these “Meiers”…
  • anon: Well I got a few friends with that name but they don’t spell it like that. It’s a German name and can be spelled as Mayar as in Amschel. 🙂 hehehe
  • anon: Ok so maybe it’s ‘a knight, in the rack-room, with a sock puppet’.
  • anon: I did a quicky and found these:

    Michèle Meier – Montreal, Canada Area – Vice President, Public Affairs and Communications, Ivanhoé Cambridge

    Bonnie Meier – Saskatchewan, Canada – Manager of Client Service at Saskatchewan Pension Plan

    Norbert Meier – Alberta, Canada – Certified Executive Coach at Meier Management Consulting

    Sidney K. “Sid” Meier – Canadian-American programmer and designer of several popular computer strategy games

    Billy Meier – FIGU-Landesgruppe Canada, Spiritual Teaching, Overpopulation, Ufology, Contact Reports5 hours ago · ??il ·

  • anon: ?anon: just adding your comment on this thread for reference.

    Re KL FB friend and addresses:

    “anon:

    KL wrote about it yesterday , he was surprised how this guy has mutual friends with him , and how RMcK managed to friend them so elusively, Graham O even talked about the addresses that this guy put on the FB page , we know it as an industrial area east of town , I think theyre too bogus , because the home address is 10 blocks south , on the same side of the road , and that is the edge of Edmonton’s residential zone , heading south , all you can find east of 50 th street , is bare industrial zoned land , non residential”

    original thread link to anons’s comment – https://www.facebook.com/groups/dumpharper/373725302660225/Canadians Against the Harper Regime

    Oddly enough as soon as I began poking around to locate some infos about Rick McKnight, the book of faces went a bit wonky. Check out this post grabbed directly from “his” wall.. https://www.facebook.com/rick.mcknight.9

  • anon: The ‘real’ ‘Pierre Poutine’, given that moniker, at least has a sense of humor!
  • anon: Infact he was RMcK was changing his picture yesterday as we were conversing on I think its Capp2.0 exploring democracy , and Kim was taking snapshots of his page as he changed the pictures , we even said this guy must be snooping on us and reacting to what were saying , just cant remember if it was CAPP 2.0 or CRUSH , it was going so fast , I think he has 2 pages , because one had a profile pic of a man with some of his front teeth missing , I got really creeped out , I’ve been living here 15 years and now this crap about a defacto coup d’etat launched from the city I call my home ?? and for what , for Harper to grab power by a sneaky kindergarden ploy??
  • anon: the plot is thicker AND closer than I thought
  • anon: The Harper Regime came to power via a Bush Cabal coup d’etat…
  • anon: Missing only were the Florida voting machines which provide no possible back-up or trace on paper.
  • anon: About the only thing we haven’t imported from the States are hanging chads, lol…
  • anon: ?anon: – did KL post the screenshots he took when this guy was changing his pictures?
  • anon: I dont remember , I dont think so , because I was busy following up on this guy , it was very interesting , maybe I can catch a face I know somewhere , I’m trying to look up my History list cant find that conversation , I even went to the Stanford University to check out the free courses
  • anon: anon et al, re the most recent high tech advances on the election fraud front, (always a red alert sign of rising fascism) did you have a chance to check out this flabbergasting series of graphs I posted the other day, demonstrating how in 2008 and in these recent Republican primaries, the results state by state have been very neatly inverted, so that the voted winner (Paul in some cased, Santorum in others) becomes the loser and Romney becomes the winner. The absolute inverse contingency between the curve of the real winner and the curve of the fraudulent winner, as presented in these graphs… well, …. NO WORDS. It is a brand new thread and most monstrously fascinating. http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?363915-We-NEED-more-hands-on-deck.-Significant-evidence-of-Algorithmic-vote-flipping.

    http://www.bluestatepress.com/politics7/news_025.htm

    Priority: We NEED more hands on deck. Significant evidence of Algorithmic vote flipping.

    http://www.ronpaulforums.comThis is a summary of a thread on this board that now is over 1,000 posts — far too many for people to ‘catch up on’, especially considering some of it is rather complicated mathematical analysis. We are at a crossroads. We NEED to bring more people on board, especially those with math/data anal…

    ·

  • anon: ?”even went to the Stanford University to check out the free courses”

    Me too! It seems our mc-knight is interested in game theory – doesn’t sound much like a guy who is a graphic artist turned web designer/developer. 🙂

  • anon: I have been following that a bit anon:. Rachel Maddow did some good reporting on this a week or two ago. I think I posted a link to the show but can’t remember for sure.
  • anon: Good. We need to KNOW. xb
  • anon: This is not really adding up at all. Trolling through Rafaels profile does not lead anywhere near RackNine and neither do his numerous websites. Seems like the fix is in somewhere, somehow…

    As Rafael, he was posting from:

    Taipei, Taiwan on Oct 15

    Japan on from Oct 17 thru Nov 13

    Kota Kinabalu on Nov 30th

    Nanaimo BC on Jan 11

    Back to Japan on Mar 11

    Now the posts being made to the Rick McKnight profile are from Edmonton, stay tuned…

  • anon: Good work Windsor! This is all very smelly.
  • anon: Want anchovies with that limburger?
  • anon: Ok, keepng this tread alive a bit with a new revalation. It seems as if Rick McKnight also has a “fan” page:

    https://www.facebook.com/pages/Rick-McKnight/172316222834108

    Rick McKnight

    Specialized in Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, Computer and Network Security, Database Systems, Software Theory, etc.

  • anon: So here’s the profile picture anon: was talking about. That is wtf creepy especially considering who this guy is supposed to represent.

    https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=308961595836236&set=a.172316456167418.44060.172316222834108&type=3&theater

    Rick McKnight

  • anon: Yikes!
  • anon: Yes thats the one , ewwe
  • anon: https://www.facebook.com/mattforalberta

    Matt Meier

    This is a test page for some Facebook apps I’m working on. You’re welcome to join and tag along in my Facebook adventures! Maybe one day Facebook will rule the world, then I’ll ask for Leduc 🙂

  • anon: AhHa…
  • anon: Why?
  • anon: For some reason, I did not put 2 and 2 together with the name, duh Louie, lol… 🙂
  • anon: You mean Matt Meier? I’m not getting it. 🙂
  • anon: Yup, remember earlier I mentioned something about who the Meiers were, after you mentioned that Alan mentioned them even earlier, or something like that, lol… :)~
  • anon: ok 🙂 – I never thought of that. I just assumed you knew.
  • anon: I better get some coffee in me, real quick, lol…
  • anon: <– names suck, don’t even ask the name of a movie I just watched, thinkin’ I need one of those infomercial coarses, but give me numbers and I am fine as wine in the summertime…
  • anon: ?:)
  • anon: I dunno, this Rick McKnight does not appear to be the same “person” as Rafael Martinez Minuesa. They have posted from different locations on several occasions…
  • anon: I think the story is total BS. The question is, why do it? Especially, if it is relatively easy to figure that out.
  • anon: Rafael has a y**tube account associated with one of his sites…

    https://www.youtube.com/user/RafaelMinuesaabout an hour ago ·

  • anon: Their thinkin’ may be that the masses usually believe anything they are told and would simply go back to sleep…
  • anon: Well here’s a simple question, Why would a guy like Rafeal want to be FB friends with KL?
  • anon: The 2 profiles don’t even use the same jargon and have totally different interests even as they relate to the interwebz. I could understand if one was for business and the other was for pleasure, but this does not pass the smell test…
  • anon: Not that KL is not friend worthy – it’s just weird.
  • anon: So what if this is all a wild goose chase? a distraction from somewhere else we need to be looking?
  • anon: Rafael does not have any of my friends on his list from what I can see, McKnight on the other hand has a couple that are subscribers KL is one of ’em, plus a lot of friends of friends. I am kinda surprised at the friends of friends to be honest since they represent a rather broad spectrum. The McKnight profile may well be a sock puppet that is trolling and data mining the book of faces…
  • anon: It is beginning to look that way, we’ll have to see how far the media goes with this and what else emerges through them. If the G&M does a follow up that is fishy, we will know the fix is in and will have the evidence to call ’em out…
  • anon: Ok friends, here we go. Upon further review, it is becoming apparent that Matt Meier has basically mislead and lied to the Globe and Mail.

    “There is absolutely nothing to hide with RackNine,” Mr. Meier said. “… Five minutes searching on Google easily demonstrates that there is no hidden story beyond a hard working, honest person.”

    The story that Rick McKnight is “Pierre Poutine” and is also Rafael Martinez Minuesa is a fabrication at best. If RackNine is now lying to the media it would appear as if they have something to hide. If this is the case than Elections Canada and the RCMP need to expand their investigations and NOW!

    Simply put, searching g**gle for 5 minutes as Matt Meier has suggested, will NOT connect Rafael Martinez Minuesa to RackNine and neither will visiting his f***book profile, his y**tube account nor his many websites.

    There is ample evidence that suggests that Rafael Martinez Minuesa is NOT the Rick McKnight that is on f***book nor the admin of the Rick McKnight “fan” page. The 2 profiles have posted from different locations geographically on multiple occasions at the same times. Not only that but neither “profile” contains any corroborating evidence that they are indeed the same individual.

    The time has come for ALL citizen journalists to blow the lid off this caper. We need to get all of this data and evidence compiled and submitted to as many individuals, media outlets and non-neocon MP’s by the end of this week. If they will not cooperate with “We the People” then we shall seek out those that can and will and expose them for collusion…

  • anon: And does it tie in to Ezra and Ethical Oil?
  • anon: Awesome anon:. I’m too tired to process right now – I don’t know how you are still awake – but I’ll be back.
  • anon: Just while I am still awake. I was wondering if the two NP journalists that wrote that story were on his friend’s list. KL or NL could have a look.
  • anon: Time to start making a database at muckety or littlesis
  • anon: ?anon:, just burned through a pot ‘o java, lol. We will have to ask ’em to poke around a bit, hopefully one or the other will notice this thread and do some follow up. We need to get some of todays, ‘er yesterdays stuff collaborated into a doc or on the site sometime soon.

    anon, it is rather difficult to connect them at this point, we may need some help from the ones that followed the website connections back into the States.

  • anon: http://cornwallfreenews.com/2012/02/whats-happening-to-freedom-in-canada-media-control-ethical-oil-by-richard-komorowski-february-13-2012/ Remembering when we found out that Ezra/ethicaloil was hosting wildrose, jasonkenney and a few other choice sites… will pull up the data lata…
  • anon: http://www.whois.net/whois/ethicaloil.org

    WHOIS information for ethicaloil.org :

    [Querying whois.publicinterestregistry.net]

    [whois.publicinterestregistry.net]

    Access to .ORG WHOIS information is provided to assist persons in

    determining the contents of a domain name registration record in the

    Public Interest Registry registry database. The data in this record is provided by

    Public Interest Registry for informational purposes only, and Public Interest Registry does not

    guarantee its accuracy. This service is intended only for query-based

    access. You agree that you will use this data only for lawful purposes

    and that, under no circumstances will you use this data to: (a) allow,

    enable, or otherwise support the transmission by e-mail, telephone, or

    facsimile of mass unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations

    to entities other than the data recipient’s own existing customers; or

    (b) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes that send

    queries or data to the systems of Registry Operator, a Registrar, or

    Afilias except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or

    modify existing registrations. All rights reserved. Public Interest Registry reserves

    the right to modify these terms at any time. By submitting this query,

    you agree to abide by this policy.

    Domain ID:D156787635-LROR

    Domain Name:ETHICALOIL.ORG

    Created On:02-Aug-2009 21:55:48 UTC

    Last Updated On:01-Aug-2011 00:12:11 UTC

    Expiration Date:02-Aug-2013 21:55:48 UTC

    Sponsoring Registrar:DomainsAtCost Corporation (R1754-LROR)

    Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED

    Status:CLIENT UPDATE PROHIBITED

    Registrant ID:DAC398130

    Registrant Name:Mr Ezra Levant

    Registrant Organization:Ezra Levant

  • anon: Ezra Levant owns http://ethicaloil.org/

    WHOIS information for ethicaloil.org :[Querying whois.publicinterestregistry.net][whois.publicinterestregistry.net]Access to .ORG WHOIS information is provided to assist persons in determining the contents of a domain name registration record in the Public Interest Registry registry database. The data in this record is provided by Public Interest Registry for informational purposes only, and Public Interest Registry does not guarantee its accuracy. This service is intended only for query-based access. You agree that you will use this data only for lawful purposes and that, under no circumstances will you use this data to: (a) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission by e-mail, telephone, or facsimile of mass unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations to entities other than the data recipient’s own existing customers; or (b) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes that send queries or data to the systems of Registry Operator, a Registrar, or Afilias except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or modify existing registrations. All rights reserved. Public Interest Registry reserves the right to modify these terms at any time. By submitting this query, you agree to abide by this policy. Domain ID:D156787635-LRORDomain Name:ETHICALOIL.ORGCreated On:02-Aug-2009 21:55:48 UTCLast Updated On:01-Aug-2011 00:12:11 UTCExpiration Date:02-Aug-2013 21:55:48 UTCSponsoring Registrar:DomainsAtCost Corporation (R1754-LROR)Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITEDStatus:CLIENT UPDATE PROHIBITEDRegistrant ID:DAC398130Registrant Name:Mr Ezra LevantRegistrant Organization:Ezra LevantRegistrant Street1:28 Pumpmeadow Crescent S.W.Registrant Street2:Registrant Street3:Registrant City:CalgaryRegistrant State/Province:abRegistrant Postal Code:T2V5C8Registrant Country:CARegistrant Phone:+1.4038155916Registrant Phone Ext.:Registrant FAX:Registrant FAX Ext.:Registrant Email:ezra@ezralevant.comAdmin ID:DAC324848Admin Name:Mr Ezra LevantAdmin Organization:Levant EzraAdmin Street1:28 Pumpmeadow Crescent S.W.Admin Street2:Admin Street3:Admin City:CalgaryAdmin State/Province:abAdmin Postal Code:T2V5C8Admin Country:CAAdmin Phone:+1.4038155916Admin Phone Ext.:Admin FAX:Admin FAX Ext.:Admin Email:ezra@ezralevant.comTech ID:DAC324848Tech Name:Mr Ezra LevantTech Organization:Levant EzraTech Street1:28 Pumpmeadow Crescent S.W.Tech Street2:Tech Street3:Tech City:CalgaryTech State/Province:abTech Postal Code:T2V5C8Tech Country:CATech Phone:+1.4038155916Tech Phone Ext.:Tech FAX:Tech FAX Ext.:Tech Email:ezra@ezralevant.comName Server:NS1.STRATEGICIMPERATIVESONLINE.COMName Server:NS2.STRATEGICIMPERATIVESONLINE.COMName Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: DNSSEC:Unsigned

    2. ns2.strategicimperativesonline.com

    • “3 Jan 2012 … ns2.strategicimperativesonline.com has one IP number (174.123.161.10), which is the same as for strategicimperativesonline.com, but the…”

    http://www.robtex.com/dns/ns2.strategicimperativesonline.com.html

    3. strategicimperativesonline.com

    • “Strategicimperativesonline.com is a domain controlled by two domain name servers at strategicimperativesonline.com themselves. Two domain…”

    http://www.robtex.com/dns/strategicimperativesonline.com.html

    4. 174.123.161

    • “ns1.strategicimperativesonline.com, a, 174.123.161.10. United States. a.a1.7bae. static.theplanet.com · ns2.strategicimperativesonline.com, a, 174.123.161.10 …”

    http://www.robtex.com/cnet/174.123.161.html

    5. http://www.strategicimperativesonline.com – Domain Names – Plot IP

    • “The domain strategicimperativesonline.com is hosted from IP address … The server hosting strategicimperativesonline.com is located in a data center in …”

    http://www.plotip.com/domain/strategicimperativesonline.com

    6. Strategicimperativesonline.com Whois lookup – Whois

    • “STRATEGICIMPERATIVESONLINE.COM – Whois Information. The data contained in GoDaddy.com, Inc.’s WhoIs database, while believed by the company to be …”

    • cqcounter.com/whois/domain/strategicimperativesonline.com.html

    7. HosterStats.com: strategicimperativesonline.com Domain Name …

    • “strategicimperativesonline.com Historical Hosting Statistics The numbers of domains hosted by strategicimperativesonline.com at the start of December in each …”

    http://www.hosterstats.com/hostersearch.php?hoster=strategicimperativesonline.com

    8. Strategicimperativesonline.com – Name server activity …

    • “18 Dec 2011 … View DNS activity for the name server strategicimperativesonline.com.”

    http://www.dailychanges.com/strategicimperativesonline.com/2011-12-18/

    9. This is who Ezra Levant (political commentator) really works for …

    • “4 days ago … STRATEGICIMPERATIVESONLINE.COM Name Server:NS2. STRATEGICIMPERATIVESONLINE.COM. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Ezra_Levant …”

    http://www.reddit.com/r/CanadaPolitics/comments/o8osx/this_is_who_ezra_levant_political_commentator/

    10. Name server ns2.strategicimperativesonline.com

    • “Name server ns2.strategicimperativesonline.com. Information about domain name server ns2.strategicimperativesonline.com. …”

    http://www.pagesinventory.com/nameserver/ns2.strategicimperativesonline.com.html

    11. Name server ns1.strategicimperativesonline.com

    • “Name server ns1.strategicimperativesonline.com. Information about domain name server ns1.strategicimperativesonline.com. …”

    http://www.pagesinventory.com/nameserver/ns1.strategicimperativesonline.com.html

    12. Do you know how much is Strategicimperativesonline.com worth for?

    • “Find Strategicimperativesonline.com Daily Ad Revenue, Daily Page Views, Site Rank, Page Rank, Total Links, Site Language, Adult Rating, Page Load Time, …”

    http://www.freewebsitereport.org/www.strategicimperativesonline.com

    13. Google Analytics (Urchin) Id: UA-20233645

    • “N/A, 174.123.161.10 (56), Google Analytics (Urchin) Id: UA-20233645 (6), ns1. strategicimperativesonline.com (5) ns2.strategicimperativesonline.com (5) …”

    • reverseinternet.com/analytics/20233645

    14. jasonkenney.net

    • “9 Oct 2011 … Google Analytics, UA-20233645 (6). Nameservers, ns1. strategicimperativesonline.com (5) ns2.strategicimperativesonline.com (5). Web hosting …”

    • reverseinternet.com/domain/jasonkenney.net

    15. http://www.americans4opec.com

    • “22 Sep 2011 … Has the following nameservers: ns1.strategicimperativesonline.com, ns2. strategicimperativesonline.com. With ip 174.123.161.10. World rank is …”

    http://www.websitelooker.com/www/americans4opec.com

    16. http://www.jasonkenney.com

    • “12 Apr 2011 … Has the following nameservers: ns1.strategicimperativesonline.com, ns2. strategicimperativesonline.com. With ip 174.123.161.10. World rank is …”

    http://www.websitelooker.com/www/jasonkenney.com

    17. JasonKenney.com – Jason Kenney – Calgary Southeast

    • “NS1.STRATEGICIMPERATIVESONLINE.COM NS2. STRATEGICIMPERATIVESONLINE.COM Domain status: clientTransferProhibited clientUpdateProhibited …”

    • whois.domaintools.com/jasonkenney.com

    18. daltonsalestax.com Whois Domain Name Records | daltonsalestax …

    • “STRATEGICIMPERATIVESONLINE.COM,NS2. STRATEGICIMPERATIVESONLINE.COM. Page rank, back links or indexed pages information is not available for …”

    http://www.enom.com/whois/default.aspx?DomainName=DaltonsAlesTax.com

    19. DoYouLookGood.com • Consulter le sujet – La salle de presse

    • “STRATEGICIMPERATIVESONLINE.COM Name Server:NS2. STRATEGICIMPERATIVESONLINE.COMOK so ezra levant seems like a legit …”

    • forums.doyoulookgood.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=178578&start=3480

    20. jasonkenney.com Whois – jason kenney – Who.is

    • “10 Mar 2011 … STRATEGICIMPERATIVESONLINE.COM Domain status: clientTransferProhibited clientUpdateProhibited. Information Updated: Thu, 10 Mar …”

    http://www.who.is/whois/jasonkenney.com/

  • anon: heh

    17 minutes ago · ??il

  • anon: ?13/01/12 11:23 AMhttp://statsie.com/more.php?t=sip&ip=174.123.161.10&ref=ethicaloil.org

    enter valid site name… Search

    112

    371Like

    TweetTweet 76

    Sites on the same ip 174.123.161.10

    site ip alexa rank change (%)

    daltonsalestax.com 174.123.161.10 1M+ 0-

    wildrosealliance.ca 174.123.161.10 1M+ 0-

    wildrosealliancecaucus.ca 174.123.161.10 1M+ 0-

    stopthetvtax.ca 174.123.161.10 1M+ 0-

    campuspc.ca 174.123.161.10 1M+ 0-

    canadiannaturalgas.ca 174.123.161.10 1M+ 0-

    heatherforsyth.com 174.123.161.10 1M+ 0-

    kathrynmarshall.ca 174.123.161.10 1M+ 0-

    esterman.com 174.123.161.10 776690 0-

    paulhinman.ca 174.123.161.10 1M+ 0-

    richarddur.ca 174.123.161.10 1M+ 0-

    ricmciver.ca 174.123.161.10 871944 26

    jasonkenney.ca 174.123.161.10 1M+ 0-

    ethicaloil.org 174.123.161.10 858352 20

  • anon: From a deleted threat at FB Ethicaloil group Ian Stephen

    Why does the so independent and grass-roots ethicaloil.org have

    the same post office box as Tony Clement’s campaign for CPC

    leadership had? Quite a coincidence.

    Maureen Sanders

    Oh nice one! The kind of ethics we

    have come to expect from Mr. Clement!!

    Stephan Sirsky

    It is a coincidence, nothing more. The

    CPC has nothing to do with EthicalOil. At most there is

    a shared interest in expanding the Canadian economy.

  • anon: I am thinkin’ that all roads are gonna lead Stateside at some point since they can hide behind the veil of secrecy a bit easier that way. Someone will eventually locate the location of the CMIS database and if it is connected in anyway it will be found out…

    Keep posting, I’ll be creating a doozie of a doc along the way but maybe it would be better to create 2 separate ones?

——————————————————————————-

Rick McKnight shared a link.

5 hours ago near Edmonton, Alberta

https://www.facebook.com/rick.mcknight.9/posts/191529817628791

  • anon: Mystery solved! hahaha

    Did you happen to find Rafael posting from somewhere else in the world at the same time?

  • anon: Not yet, McKnight is using the new profile and Rafael is using the old one, then I was distracted grabbing the latest screenshot and source coding for the post link…
  • anon: Can he be posting (or appear to be) from more than one place at the same time – is that possible?
  • anon: It is possible if using a proxy and can be done from the same computer if set up properly. The physical location is determined by the virtualearth scripts that reference the isp location so if you use a proxy, your location would be elsewhere.
  • anon: ok thanks 🙂
  • anon: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_Can_You_Be_in_Two_Places_at_Once_When_You%27re_Not_Anywhere_at_All
  • anon: ?anon, I hate when that happens, lol…

———————————————————————–

So what’s “redacted”?

http://creekside1.blogspot.ca/

“Unfuckablewith discovers CISM is “designed explicitly” to be integrated with “a feature to perform robocalls on a nationwide level”. He has a working draft up on security flaws in the CIMS and LiberaList, with the most interesting bits so far redacted while he thinks them through :

“A shocking amount of personal information is stored on these servers and can be recalled for use in individual campaign offices and on Parliament Hill via a secure VPN connection to the main Conservative Party servers. While this leaves the system vulnerable to [redacted], the greater issue is that in the process of establishing this VPN connection, the data [redacted], and thus, outside of the control of Canadian authorities.”

“the data ___ and thus outside the control of Canadian authorities” ???

The data is what? Stored in the fridge? Stored on servers at some US voter- ID/townhall company?”

Creekside

creekside1.blogspot.com

  • anon: This is only a guess but VPN’s have various vulnerabilities, some are username enumerations, SQL injections, XSS cross-site scripting, and SSL related.
  • anon: This was posted on Unfuckablewith yesterday:

    Regarding the sources of my data.

    * Unreleased data from Elections Canada (which won’t be released publicly until charges are laid)

    * Sources within each major political party (predominantly from the Tories)

    * Information from certain Members of Parliament

    * Personal interviews, call logs, audio recordings from the ridings affected

    * Experts in the fields of political science, political philosophy, psychology, sociology, computer science, economics, telecommunications, and cryptography

    * Military contractors and commercial suppliers of equipment used for communications, robocalling, and tech journalism

    * Reports in the national media (television, newspapers)

    * Extensive data-mining and analysis

    What I did not rely on:

    * Blogs/bloggers

    * Politically-biased information (including my own politics)

    * Obvious misdirection and propaganda from party members (you guys are pretty easy to spot, plus I triple-check every source and piece of data I receive)

    * Other journalists with documented ties to political parties

    * Long-form poetry and conspiracy theories emailed to me at 5:00am.

  • anon: http://thegallopingbeaver.blogspot.ca/2012/03/more-pretty-dots-more-evidence.html
  • anon: ?”…in the process of establishing this VPN connection, the data [redacted], and thus, outside of the control of Canadian authorities”

    The data was sent somewhere? stored somewhere else? integrated into a larger data base? accessed by someone else?3 hours ago · ??il

  • anon: This may be a bit of a stretch but if you remember the EthicalOil saga, the citizen journalists/investigators/researchers combined to find the the Tories and their affiliates utilize US based hosting and servers for almost of their websites.

    If this is the case here, and the servers and data are Stateside, the RCMP would have to request the data via the US court system, unless the provider hands it over voluntarily. If they did though, they could be liable.

    I am not sure if electoral fraud committed against a nation outside of the US is illegal in the US. (not sure if that last statement makes sense but maybe you get the gist of it)

  • anon: Now, here is a bit of a twist if we take Bairds comments about emails not being reliable, he stated that not only could they be labeled/filtered spam and not go through the system but he eluded to the fact that many of the MP’s have viruses in their computers as well. We may be able to assUme that the CMIS data has already been intercepted and acquired by a third party.

    Keep in mind, these neocons are not the sharpest knifes in the drawer and I am fairly certain that they issued easy usernames and many of them did not utilize adequate passwords…

  • anon: Yes it made sense.
  • anon: Well, I was remembering some research I did on Stuxnet and cryptographic keys and how part of the virus works by using ‘escalation of privilege vulnerabilities’ to gain access to the system. I am assuming this same sort of thing could have been done with the CMIS system.
  • anon: They could also utilize more rudementry ways as well, in much the same way hackers gain access to profiles on social media sites. But if they did infect a computer, they would have access to any/all passwords as well as any/all data on the hard drives…
  • anon: So, this whole thing could have been hatched and executed from outside of Canada?
  • anon: Yup…
  • anon: ok – I think I got it. 🙂
  • anon: That would definitely circumvent Canadian laws for quite some time…
  • anon: Treason

————————————————————

Identity of mystery employee deepens robocall puzzle

http://www.ottawacitizen.com

A key employee of the company that was used to send out the misdirecting robocalls in Guelph on election day appears not to exist under the name he uses online.

Cambridge, Ontario

  • anon: These are ‘sock puppets’ for obvious reasons

    Chris Peter

    “George Monbiot reports in The Guardian that “the US Air Force has been tendering for companies to supply it with persona management software, which will perform the following tasks:

    a. Create “10 personas per user, replete with background, history, supporting details, and cyber presences that are technically, culturallyand geographically consistent … Personas must be able to appear to originate in nearly any part of the world and can interact through conventional online services and social media platforms.”

    b. Automatically provide its astroturfers with “randomly selected IP addresses through which they can access the internet” (an IP address is the number which identifies someone’s computer), and these are to be changed every day, “hiding the existence of the operation”. The software

    should also mix up the astroturfers’ web traffic with “traffic from multitudes of users from outside the organisation. This traffic blending provides excellent cover and powerful deniability.”

    c. Create “static IP addresses” for each persona, enabling different astroturfers “to look like the same person over time”. It should also allow “organisations that frequent same site/service often to easily switch IP addresses to look like ordinary users as opposed to one organisation.”

    Software like this has the potential to destroy the internet as a forum for constructive debate. It jeopardises the notion of online democracy. Comment threads on issues with major commercial implications are already being wrecked by what look like armies of organised trolls – as you can sometimes see on guardian.co.uk. The internet is a wonderful gift, but it’s also a bonanza for corporate lobbyists, viral marketers and government spin doctors, who can operate in cyberspace without regulation, accountability or fear of detection. So let me repeat the question I’ve put in previous articles, and which has yet to be satisfactorily answered: what should we do to fight these tactics?”

    e software should also mix up the astroturfers’ web traffic with “traffic from multitudes of users from outside the organisation. This traffic blending provides excellent cover and powerful deniability.”

  • anon: Here is a good article that is well worth the read but I’ll copypasta couple of snippets to peak your curiosity…

    The Pentagon and its Sock Puppets

    By Scott Horton

    An internal Department of Defense review has concluded that a Rumsfeld-era program under which retired military officers who appeared on American broadcast media were given special briefings and access was consistent with Pentagon rules.

    The internal review also apparently found no fault with the exclusion of four individuals precisely because they refused to be sock puppets, speaking critically of some Pentagon decisions. One of them, General Wesley Clark, apparently lost his position as an analyst for CNN because of Pentagon and White House displeasure with what he had to say.

    In his 1961 farewell address, President Dwight Eisenhower warned against the “acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex.” Although he was persuaded that this new relationship between the Pentagon and its contractors was “a vital element in keeping the peace,” he was deeply troubled by the relationship’s potential to disrupt the delicate balance of interests that is fundamental to a modern democracy. David Barstow’s investigation provided some of the most subtle and compelling evidence of this process to appear in recent years. The Pentagon’s self-exonerating report, by contrast, suggests that media sock puppets may become a modus operandi.

    http://www.harpers.org/archive/2011/12/hbc-90008374

    The Pentagon and its Sock Puppets—By Scott Horton (Harper’s Magazine)

    http://www.harpers.orgAn internal Department of Defense review has concluded that a Rumsfeld-era program under which retired military officers who appeared on American broadcast media were given special briefings and access was consistent with Pentagon rules. The New York Times reports:

  • anon: ?anon:

    I guess great minds think alike or something like that. I just had that Horton article lined up to post here now I see you already posted it. 🙂

  • anon: I like that article because it includes Gen Wesley Clark and Dwight D. Eisenhower and connects the dots rather well. The only thing missing are much needed references to the NAZI sympathizer Prescott and, like father like son H.W., who was rapidly rising through the ranks of the seeEYEeh during those times. It would also have been nice if they would have tied into the fact that both Cheney and Rumsfeld began their “political” careers in the late 1960’s. But hey, whaddya do…
  • anon: I know ya wanna but ya just can’t have it all ?anon. 🙂
  • anon: We’ll take what we can get and connect the dots ourselves… 🙂
  • anon: They have all been connected for generations.
  • anon: Bishop Strachan School old girl married to UCC old boy and banking head here interviews another UCC old boy http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/valerie-pringle/ – and see http://www.bss.on.ca/thelink/post.php?id=266
  • anon: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ford_meets_with_Rumsfeld_and_Cheney,_April_28,_1975.jpg

———————————————————————–

Canadian Conservatives work best under cover of darkness. In government, committees are now routinely forced into in camera sessions. Documents and records are withheld to the point that the Harper government has twice been found in contempt of Parliament. Vital facts and figures are suppressed. Scientists are muzzled, to international opprobrium. Legitimate opposition questions are ruled out of order by Harper catspaw Andrew Scheer, or simply go unanswered.

But that’s not the half of it.

In the country formerly known as Canada, the Conservatives have made a practice of appointing pseudo-MPs in ridings actually held by other parties. Only a constitutional lawyer can determine if the elected MPs have had their privileges breached, but it is a sleazy and unethical practice: unprecedented, as so many Conservative attacks on democracy have been.

http://drdawgsblawg.ca/2012/03/the-deepening-shadows-of-canadian-politics.shtml

———————————————————————–

Oddly enough as soon as I began poking around to locate some infos about Rick McKnight, the book of faces went a bit wonky. Check out this post grabbed directly from “his” wall..

https://www.facebook.com/rick.mcknight.9

  • .si?? s??il anon:
    • anon: Just below that post is one that says, “Learn Game Theory Stanford University’s free online courses” with a link to this article.

      http://news.stanford.edu/news/2012/march/online-courses-mitchell-030612.html and then this one on the Game Theory Course.

      https://www.coursera.org/gametheory/auth/welcome

      “Popularized by movies such as “A Beautiful Mind”, game theory is the mathematical modeling of strategic interaction among rational (and irrational) agents. Beyond what we call ‘games’ in common language, such as chess, poker, soccer, etc., it includes the modeling of conflict among nations, political campaigns, competition among firms, and trading behavior in markets such as the NYSE. How could you begin to model eBay, Google keyword auctions, and peer to peer file-sharing networks, without accounting for the incentives of the people using them? The course will provide the basics: representing games and strategies, the extensive form (which computer scientists call game trees), Bayesian games (modeling things like auctions), repeated and stochastic games, and more. We’ll include a variety of examples including classic games and a few applications.”

      Stanford offers more free online classes for the world

      news.stanford.eduIn an ongoing experiment to leverage new educational technologies, the university is launching five free online classes this month.

    • anon: Sock Puppets Unite!
    • anon: Odd thing about this particular profile is that there are 2 friends that are also friends with the profile. I sure hope they have been trolling it and not engaging with it???
    • anon: I think that’s the case Windsor. NL has a humougous # of friends – she friends everybody. 🙂 And KL I imagine is keeping watch.
    • anon: I just worry about the troll back, blow-back, since they do not block their friend lists from being visible…
    • anon: Stanford, home of Haarp angels don’t play
    • anon: Bahaha, the dude was gloating about himself on his fake profile!
    • anon: KL wrote about it yesterday , he was surprised how this guy has mutual friends with him , and how RMcK managed to friend them so elusively, Graham O even talked about the addresses that this guy put on the FB page , we know it as an industrial area east of town , I think theyre too bogus , because the home address is 10 blocks south , on the same side of the road , and that is the edge of Edmonton’s residential zone , heading south , all you can find east of 50 th street , is bare industrial zoned land , non residential
    • anon: Very interesting…

      We have been doing some follow up on this thread anon:

      https://www.facebook.com/groups/dumpharper/373994495966639/Canadians Against the Harper Regime

      An Alberta company swept up in the controversy over fake election robo-calls engineered by someone calling themselves “Pierre Poutine” is acknowledging one of its employees operates under a pseudonym. But RackNine says the contractor – who volunteered briefly on a local Conservative campaign in Edmonton last federal election – has nothing to do with its automated call operations. RackNine Inc. chief executive Matt Meier says a web designer and marketer who operates under the name of “Rick McKnight” is a Spaniard named Rafael Martinez Minuesa. RackNine was first contacted by journalists Monday about “Rick McKnight” because the staffer seemed to have no footprint in the real world. The firm says it initially balked at revealing his true identity because they didn’t want to breach their staffer’s right to privacy. But journalists quickly drew media attention to the mystery staffer. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-notebook/firm-at-centre-of-robo-call-storm-unmasks-mystery-employee/article2375881/

    • anon: hmmm – very interesting indeed anon

———————————————————————-

A key employee of the company that was used to send out the misdirecting robocalls in Guelph on election day appears not to exist under the name he uses online.

“How does one define a real person?” said [Racknine lawyer, R. Justin] Matthews in an email. “Would a web-design employee that chooses to use a different name online (which some people seem to do these days) be considered a real person?”

McKnight maintains a Facebook friendship with many people, including journalists, politicians and officials, although none of the people contacted by Postmedia News could say they knew him.

In addition to those who say they don’t know him, McKnight is “friends” with Guy Giorno, who chaired Stephen Harper’s 2011 campaign, Guelph campaign worker Andrew Prescott, former Harper communications directors Dimitri Soudas and Kory Teneycke, and current director of communications for the party Fred DeLorey.

He is also Facebook friends with Susan Delacourt of the Toronto Star, and a number of Sun News Network personalties, including Brian Lilley.

McKnight lists as a friend only one opposition MP, Charlie Angus, who has been leading the NDP’s robocalls attacks in the House. But McKnight is friends with dozens of Conservative MPs, including cabinet ministers James Moore, Keith Ashfield, Joe Oliver and Steven Fletcher, and MP Eve Adams, who previously employed Guelph campaign worker Michael Sona.

McKnight is friends with Meier and many of his associates in Alberta, including Ryan Hastman, the former Conservative candidate in Edmonton-Strathcona, who is now an organizer with the provincial Wildrose Alliance party.

http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/03/19/who-is-rick-mcknight-no-one-seems-to-know-who-the-mystery-employee-for-robocall-company-racknine-really-is/

Robocalls: Who is Rick McKnight? No one seems to know who the mystery RackNine employee really is |.

news.nationalpost.com

A key employee of the company that was used to send out the misdirecting robocalls in Guelph on election day appears not to exist under the name he uses online.

  • anon: Meet Rick McKnight via the book of faces:

    https://www.facebook.com/rick.mcknight.9

    Rick McKnight

  • anon: Follow Rick McKnight via tw*tter:

    https://twitter.com/racknine

    RackNine (@racknine) on Twitter

    twitter.comSign up for Twitter to follow RackNine (@racknine). Web Hosting solutions, Softw…

  • anon: Check out Rick McKnight via link*edin:

    http://www.linkedin.com/in/racknineo??

  • anon: Visit Rick McKnights webpage:

    http://www.racknine.com/

    Welcome to RackNine Inc, Web Hosting in Canada

    http://www.racknine.comHigh-quality, inexpensive web hosting solutions. Domain name registration, SSL c…

  • anon: ?”On Manta, another business networking website, McKnight is listed as the head of marketing for both RackNine and Sumex Inc., an Edmonton investment banking firm.

    Russel Matichuk, vice president of Sumex, said Monday that he had talked to RackNine about getting them to do some work, but they never did.

    “That’s weird,” he said. “There has never been anyone by that name that’s been head of marketing.”

    Ya, that is very weird. ·

  • anon: he’s as illusive as Tyler Durdan
  • anon: ?anon: – I didn’t find anything on him at link*edin I got ‘Profile not found’. Were you being cryptic or was there something there earlier?
  • anon: ?anon:, there was indeed something there earlier, when I posted this info. They must be scrubbing the trail, guess I shoulda grabbed screenshots but like I mentioned above, my browser went wonky…
  • anon: Here is something of interest and considering the fb “profile” has some info about “Anonymous” it seems as if “he” may/should have some experience with SQL injections as well.

    Hi, Rick McKnight is using OnePage to put all contact details on a single page. Sign up now to get your OnePage card.

    Rick McKnight

    Web Developer, RackNine Inc.

    Application Developer, Database Administrator, and Project Manager in a wide variety of business applications. Particularly interested in Content Management Systems using PHP and MySQL.

    http://www.myonepage.com/racknine

    Rick McKnight (racknine) on OnePage – interactive contact cards

    myonepage.comApplication Developer, Database Administrator, and Project Manager in a wide var…??o? ??S

  • anon: it’s obviously Meier. Meier is also hiring in the Philippines. There’s some interesting speculation about SEO fraud, but where did the SQL injection comment come from?
  • anon: I have been poking around the profile and SQL injections are the primary way to access databases. Racknine and the neocons CMIS database that seems to have a lot of data from somewhere.

    That begs answers to the following questions:

    Who acquired all that data?

    How did they acquire all of that data?

    Where did they acquire all that data?

    When did they acquire all that data?

    Did they acquire the data legally?

    Then, just for fun,

    Is the non-existent Rick McKnight, the elusive “Anonymous” member behind the Vic Toews operation?

    Was the Vic Toews operation a “false flag” attack?

————————————————————————

Tomorrow/later on today, I’ll start posting my analysis of all 98 ridings (out of 308) where there were major voting irregularities, or robocalling, or outright voter suppression. I’m not going to mince words: the Conservative Party is responsible for the overwhelming majority of these. I have 21 separate incidents where they broke the law — with proof. I also have around another 20 where they seriously infringed on the rights of Canadians to have fair and free elections. A lot of ridings involve Ministers of the Crown. With the exception of Guelph (which is still extremely unclear), there is absolutely no evidence of wrongdoing by either the Liberal Party or NDP.

ALL of my projections from recalculating the 2011 general election show a Conservative minority government, at the expense of the Liberals (notwithstanding the unpopularity of Michael Ignatieff). First I started with the effects of 34 ridings, as reported/provided by the opposition parties. By myself I was able to uncover the rest. Adding that into my projections, the Conservative Party actually would’ve LOST SEATS, the NDP would be very strong, but they probably wouldn’t be the official opposition. I don’t feel it prudent to give you an exact seat total at 5:20am after I’ve taken an Ambien (because I will be proven wrong by my own findings in a few hours), but I will later.

So, today you can expect:

http://unfuckwithable.ca/post/19567318936

The endgame. Tomorrow/later on today, I’ll start posting my analysis of all 98 ridings (out of 308).

unfuckwithable.ca

The endgame. Tomorrow/later on today, I’ll start posting my analysis of all 98 ridings (out of 308) where there were major voting irregularities, or robocalling, or outright voter suppression. I’m not…

  • anon: Be sure to bookmark and check the homepage often as it is already being updated with new information…

    http://unfuckwithable.ca/

    unfuckwithable.ca

    Brian-Michel is/est: • French-Canadian/American • 29 years old

  • anon: not just because I’m an NDP supporter, but I know in my gut that Layton won the debates and was sure of far more votes ( suppressed ) than Harper, in my opinion, despite his succumbing to cancer, he was the strongest candidate I’ve seen in a very long time and clearly Canadians overwhelmingly ( and especially in Quebec ) wanted change … you know what they say … beware the popular man … Harper must have envied Layton for so many reasons, not the least of which was a personality and ability to roll up his sleeves and take on Harper on anything and everything, Layton … the Greatest Prime Minister we never had …
  • anon: ?… by the way .. very commendable work done on this
  • anon: Brian-Michel is doing a great job putting all of this together…

———————————————————-


Please feel free to add feedback, additional info, alternative contact details, related links, articles, anonymous submission, etc. as a comment below, via web-form, through social media or mail us directly and confidentially at: dumpharper [at] live [dot] ca


This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. and intend its use to be for education and instructional purposes only. Therefore, we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond “fair use,” you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

ShareAlike Statement: https://dumpharper.wordpress.com/sharealike/

article text

continue reading source:


Remember, politics is a contact sport, like hockey, so please feel free to add quick contributions, observations and relevant information as a comment below!

Contact us if you would like to contribute to our collaborative efforts or would like to share/submit articles, data or additional content, feel free to add feedback, additional info, alternative contact details, related links, articles, anonymous submission, etc. as a comment below, via web-form, through social media outlets or email us directly and confidentially at: dumpharper [at] live [dot] ca


This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. and intend its use to be for education and instructional purposes only. Therefore, we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond “fair use,” you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

ShareAlike Statement: https://dumpharper.wordpress.com/sharealike/

Investigators strike information ‘gold’ in Elections Canada robocalls probe: source

By Stephen Maher and Glen McGregor
Postmedia News | Mar 15, 2012 7:46 PM ET | Last Updated: Mar 16, 2012 8:58 AM ET | More from Postmedia News

National Post files
Protesters gathered and chanted at Toronto’s Yonge and Dundas Square, over the weekend in what they called the National Day of Action Against Election Fraud. Elections Canada has reviewed many reports of Canadians receiving robocalls.

An investigation that began with one former Mountie methodically following a fuzzy electronic trail has broadened and intensified since the robocalls story broke last month, sparking more than 700 members of the public to complain to Elections Canada.

On Thursday, Marc Mayrand, the chief electoral officer, issued a statement promising to get to the bottom of allegations of “fraudulent or improper calls.”

“Over 700 Canadians from across the country have informed us of specific circumstances where they believe similar wrongdoing took place,” the statement said. “I appreciate the interest that Canadians have shown in this matter and thank them for their continued collaboration.”

Mayrand also warned against “drawing conclusions based on possibly inaccurate and incomplete information,” and offered to appear before a parliamentary committee to discuss the investigation.

On March 2, Elections Canada said that it had already received 31,000 submissions. It later stated that the majority of those “contacts” were the result of an online petition calling for a public inquiry.

But some of the information provided to the agency is “gold,” according to a source close to the investigation, and some complainants have reported followup calls from investigators.

At least one other Elections Canada investigator, Tim Charbonneau, has joined former RCMP inspector Al Mathews, who is leading the probe. They have interviewed witnesses beyond Guelph, which suggests they are taking seriously reports of telephone mischief in other communities.

According to a CBC investigation voters who revealed they would not be voting Conservative received robocalls sending them to fake polling stations.

The report suggests the misleading phone calls relied on data gathered by the Conservative Party.

continue reading source: http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/03/15/investigators-striking-information-gold-in-elections-canada-robocalls-probe-source/


Remember, politics is a contact sport, like hockey, so please feel free to add quick contributions, observations and relevant information as a comment below!

Contact us if you would like to contribute to our collaborative efforts or would like to share/submit articles, data or additional content, feel free to add feedback, additional info, alternative contact details, related links, articles, anonymous submission, etc. as a comment below, via web-form, through social media outlets or email us directly and confidentially at: dumpharper [at] live [dot] ca


This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. and intend its use to be for education and instructional purposes only. Therefore, we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond “fair use,” you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

ShareAlike Statement: https://dumpharper.wordpress.com/sharealike/

The Bear Cat’s musings: Canada: Democracy under siege


What does Stephen Harper think of Elections Canada? In 2001 he called them “Jackasses”.As in “The jackasses at Elections Canada are out of control.”

Well it appears the Jackasses are still out of control, but they aren’t in Elections Canada, they are in the Stephen Harper Party.

Canada was a bastion of freedom, a place for the world to look for inspiration. Sadly that is no longer true.

It took a long time for us to evolve from settling electoral campaigns with fist fights to buying votes with bottles of whiskey to our recent system of campaigning to present the reasons why one should vote for this candidate rather than that candidate.

No, while we were sending our ships and planes and foot soldiers to places across this world to free other countries from oppressive regimes we had an oppressive regime forming right here.

Harper said it himself, I’m in charge, I make the rules. And when he doesn’t like the rules it is fine to walk all over them. But only Him and His people.

At the same time that Harper’s Omnibus Bill to put the bad guys in prison longer, to make Canada “safer” was being debated, the Harper Party was challenging the court’s ruling against them in the “In and Out” scandal. And what a penalty the Harper Party paid, some fines, and the ones that admitted guilt kept their comfy red velour seats in the Senate.

Not long ago, the opposition parties wanted the Harper Party staffers called before Committee to answer for issues that were being raised. No less a person than John Baird rose up and shouted that the staffers were not to be called but the Ministers who were in charge. He would not stand for bullying of staffers by the Opposition Members on the Committee, but now that the Harper Party wants a Liberal staffer called onto the carpet the story changes.

Dean Del Mastro says that if the Liberals wanted then they should be willing to allow it now. I say stuff it in your hat Dean Del Mastro. Baird set the precedent, you live with it. Or does Dean Del Mastro advocate two sets of rules for Canada? One for the Harperistas and one for the rest?

In 2001 Stephen Harper warned that the Internet should not be infringed on by government and that the free flow of information was essential to Canada. His infringement of the Internet got booted to Committee in record time, likely because Vic Toews called Canadians paedophiles rather that it just being a bad law.

Ask the prairie wheat growers about Harper’s stance on democracy. They had a constitution for the Canadian Wheat Board that required that the farmers vote to dissolve it if they so desired. Harper ignored that and wrote his new law that in effect breaks the old one.

Now we have Elections Canada investigating vote suppression that occurred during the last Federal Election, the “Robocall” scandal. Harassing phone calls to non-Harper Party supporters late at night or early in the morning or on the Sabbath designed to drive supporters of the other parties away from the polls and going as far as contacting people on Election Day to falsely inform them that their polling station had been moved. Was this an attempt to keep non-Harper Party voters from voting?

It certain looks like it to me.

When the issue was raised in the House of Commons, the Harper Party response was predictable to say the least. A staffer was sacrificed, thrown under the bus and the finger pointed at him. When he denied involvement the finger was pointed at the Liberals, accusing them of undermining their own campaign efforts and suggesting that the Liberals had hired a U.S. firm to make these calls while the Harper Party boasted that they had not used any U.S. firms.

Even though the Harper Party was shown to be “in error” over these “facts” they still maintain their story.

That is called lying.

And lying to the House of Commons is Contempt.

Our only hope at this time is that Elections Canada with the RCMP will be able to trace what the message of the calls was, and who caused those calls to be made. And whether they will have the freedom to investigate this scandal.

This investigation has grown from one or two constituencies to forty or more. There are complaints of harassing calls and fake Elections Canada messages directing people to the wrong or nonexistent Polling Stations and now even voting cards directing people to incorrect Polling Stations sent to addresses, but with no names on them.

Had Stephen Harper and His Party stood with the Opposition to decry the Robocall scandal and make efforts to get to the bottom of this and see that the guilty are held accountable they might have avoided much of the scandal. But their antics, blaming a rogue operative, blaming the Opposition, and now they’re even blaming Elections Canada. This is beyond belief.

The Harper Party is standing in Elections Canada way when they ask to see the actual receipts for election expenses. And now we are finding out that although the Harper Party candidate from Guelph apparently used Racknine’s robocall services in the election, they didn’t include any charges from Racknine in their expenses.

Apparently some candidates used Visa Cards and PayPal to pay Racknine for services and then reimbursing whoever paid the charge. This strikes me as odd. When I was in business we were billed directly and paid directly. Only incidentals were handled differently, small items through petty cash, but only with the receipt.

Calls to Racknine are showing up from MLA and MP constituency offices. Constituency offices are only to be used for government business and electioneering is not government business.

But what surprises me the most is that this story has was discovered by and driven by the staunch supporters of the Harper Party, the National Post.

The National Post says they know where the Robocall scandal ends, in the Stephen Harper Party computers, in the Constituency Information Management System database.

It seems the National Post is more interested in right and wrong than being on the right politically.

Where does Stephen Harper stand?

Well we got some late breaking news…. Seems that Stephen Harper has decided to join with the NDP and support the New Democrats’ proposal to enhance the power of Elections Canada to see documents and new rules governing Robocallers… But he is mentioning something about six months from now…

And it seems that around 2700 people in the riding or Eglinton-Lawrence showed up at polling stations without voter registration cards and filled out forms in order to vote, but [in violation of the Election Act] an unknown number left their current and previous addresses blank and others used false addresses… This is a riding where the Liberal candidate complained about harassing phone calls… and lost his riding by about 3000 votes… Go figure.

Maybe we need to start running our elections like the Third World countries who are trying to use Democratic means to oust Dictators and their regimes.

I’ll dip my finger after I vote, I just hope the ink isn’t blue.


  • Anon: Excellent Blog, Bear Cat. Keep nailing them with those claws of yours.

  • Anon: Very good Bear Cat! And we also have ‘politcal super weapons’ and the mysterious shenanigans going on in the 2010 Fantino by-election campaign, the second bank account and “the guy with the red goatee …who worked the computers”.Here is what we are left with. No one knows who the guy with the red goatee is who worked the computers alongside Stephen Lecce in the Fantino by-election campaign office, despite how popular red goatees are becoming. No one knows if there really were two bank accounts for the Julian Fantino by-election run. No one knows if the Fantino campaign did or didn’t lend surplus campaign funds to other Tory candidates, and if it did, if there is anything wrong with that.”
    http://www.ipolitics.ca/2012/03/08/michael-harris-was-a-political-super-weapon-part-of-robogate/


    Was a ‘political super-weapon’ part of Robogate? | iPolitics

    www.ipolitics.ca


  • Anon:As well as the Quebec “In and Out”….Meanwhile, Le Devoir has raised questions about whether the national campaign effectively transferred money “in and out” to local campaign accounts, not for advertising expenses, but for voter identification and mobilization purposes.The Quebec newspaper reported that at least two Conservative candidates in Quebec agreed to requests by the national campaign office to pay money to RMG — the Toronto-based Responsive Marketing Group — during the 2011 campaign but told the newspaper they did not know exactly what services were rendered for the money.We were a kind of mailbox for funding that,” Le Devoir quoted defeated Conservative candidate Bertin Denis, who lost to the NDP’s Guy Caron in the riding of Rimouski-Neigette-Témiscouata-Les Basques. “We had nothing to say on the operations of it. They didn’t call me, and nobody was called. I wasn’t part of a survey, nobody consulted me.”Denis said his riding had been targeted by Conservative Party headquarters as winnable, so the party agreed to spend more on it, putting some $55,000 into the campaign.”We didn’t pay (the contract with RMG)” he is quoted in Le Devoir. “The funding came from the national and we wrote a cheque.”

    His official agent Ghislain Pelletier confirmed to Le Devoir that we were strongly advised to take it.”

    Pelletier said the Conservative Party “sent us the bill and I paid it on the recommendation of the party.”

    Asked if the party or RMG supplied the local campaign with the results of the calls, Pelletier, a trained accountant, said: “Absolutely nothing, ma’am. If I were in a private business, I would have demanded a report.”
    http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/1142109–robocalls-elections-canada-expands-probe-into-fraudulent-messages-in-2011-vote

    Robocalls: Elections Canada expands probe into fraudulent messages in 2011…

    Elections Canada refers voters to online form to report concerns about misleading phone calls in the 2011 federal election.


  • Anon: What about in-and-out for robocalls in Guelph?

  • Anon: Re: the Fantino campaign article Who are these people?” Stephen Lecce, volunteer co-ordinator Madi Murariu and “a large man with a reddish goatee”.

  • Anon: “A staffer in the Prime Minister’s Office has gone from being a registered lobbyist to working for the Prime Minister and being lobbied on the same subject he once pushed, a practice one advocacy group says is worrisome because of potential conflicts of interest that could arise. ”
    http://www.hilltimes.com/hill-climbers/2010/11/01/lecce-takes-leave-from-pmo-to-work-on-fantinos-byelection-bid/24806

    Lecce takes leave from PMO to work on Fantino’s byelection bid | hilltimes.com

    www.hilltimes.com
    Canada’s Politics and Government Newsweekly


  • Anon: good work. we need an “unwanted” picture gallery/album for all the neo-con operatives and bag men/women.

  • Anon: That’s an excellent idea Anon. A bit of a “rogues gallery” of all the people involved and associated with the Robocon. The Dump Harper WordPress site may be a good place for it. https://dumpharper.wordpress.com/2012/02/25/enough/
    Had Enough?

    dumpharper.wordpress.com
    Welcome to the Dump Harper weblog brought to you by the Canadians Against the Harper Regime (CAHR)


  • Anon: From the Fantino campaign article linked above:”No one knows who the guy with the red goatee is who worked the computers alongside Stephen Lecce in the Fantino by-election campaign office…”Well… Stephen Lecce must know. Anyone asked him? Madi Murariu must know. Anyone asked him? And the “EDA member responsible for obtaining signatures for Mr. Fantino’s nomination papers for the by-election”, the woman who sent the affidavit to Elections Canada mentioning the mysterious computer guy with the red goatee, might subsequently have recognized this person from recently pictures published pictures. Anyone asked her? And Julian Fantino must know along with numerous others involved in the campaign.

  • Anon: Is this Madi? Check out her “Likes”.
    http://www.facebook.com/murariu

    Madi Murariu

    University of Ottawa
    Parliament of Canada


  • Anon: Stephen Lecce from PMO from Macleans January 29, 2010 article ‘Hill Helps Haiti fundraiser packed’

    “Folks from all parties packed the Hill Helps Haiti fundraiser organized by the government relations firm Summa Strategies. The event raised over $32,000. Below, Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq (left) and Minister of Fisheries and Oceans Gail Shea.”


    http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/29/hill-helps-haiti-fundraiser-packed/
    www2.macleans.ca


  • Anon: So do I have this right? This guy who is the deputy director of communications for the PMO and who is in everyday direct contact with the PM, gets leave to go work on the Fantino campaign in 2010 where he turns up working in some “private office” with the mysterious red goatee computer guy. Other influential campaign workers (one’s that were concerned the campaign may be violating Election Canada laws) didn’t know what they were doing in there.Was the alleged second bank account paying for whatever activities were being directed from that second private office.
    http://www.corrieretandem.com/viewstory.php?storyid=11859
    http://www.hilltimes.com/news/2010/11/22/critics-curious-about-pmo-staffer-on-leave-working-on-fantino-campaign/27748
    Thoughts anyone?


    Tandem – Online magazine

    www.corrieretandem.com
    Stephen Lecce with Prime Minister, Stephen Harper. At just 25 years of age, he is …


  • Anon: ElectRight – “According to the Fantino campaign filing for the 2011 general election, a Barrie company called Electright did his robocalling at a cost of $15,820. There was no claim for phone services in the 2010 by-election.”
    From their website: http://electright.ca/services.php
    “The key task of any campaign is identifying your supporters. ElectRight provides live campaign calling that has made the difference for numerous campaigns. As volunteers are in increasingly short supply, use ElectRight to make these critical calls for you.With our LIVE Customer Service Representatives, we will make thousands of calls to the voters in your riding and identify who they are supporting. Our CSRs, managed by seasoned political managers, will contact individuals utilizing customized scripts about your candidate. As each caller speaks English fluently, your message will be clearly communicated.The ElectRight Team will ensure that the data collected by our Live CSRs is compiled in specific fields to segment the information and returned in a format that is compatible with your database and software requirements.”


    FlectRight — Our Services

    www.electright.ca


  • Anon: ‎”ElectRight – $11,300
    There’s got to be some website template that includes pre-written copy and stock photos for all of these “direct”/”live campaign call”/”virtual townhall”/”IVR” businesses that exist to only serve Conservative-leaning candidates across Canada. I know my torrented copy of Adobe Creative Suite doesn’t include it, so I’m at a loss. What I do know is that every internal poll of theirs I was able to obtain has Dean Del Mastro’s letterhead all over it (it takes up over half the page). Oh, and it wasn’t just this instance. However I’m curious about the Peterborough-Willowdale connection. Regardless, I’m printing out Dean Del Mastro’s letterhead because it could double as a life-size model of Parliament Hill.”
    http://unfuckwithable.ca/post/18893913793


    Willowdale (GTA) I’ve been meaning to get into the GTA for a while now (other than my inexplicable obsession with Etobicoke Centre), but this time I’m looking at Willowdale, a former Liberal…

    unfuckwithable.ca


  • Anon:“Conservative MP Wladyslaw Lizon says he ran a clean campaign to win the Mississauga East-Cooksville riding last May.Lizon, who defeated former Ontario Labour Minister Peter Fonseca by 661 votes to earn the seat, flatly denies charges from the Liberals and NDP that put his riding on the list of 34 (so far) across the country where opposition parties charge callers working for Conservatives suppressed opposition votes by phoning or using robocalls to direct non-Conservative voters to incorrect polling stations.”My campaign was not involved in any harassing or misleading phone calls,” Lizon told The Mississauga News. “If there were calls, I was not involved — I ran a clean campaign.”Lizon said he did not use RMG, the polling company for which Conservative strategist Stewart Braddick worked. Workers at an Ottawa call centre have alleged they were directed by RMG to make misleading calls to non-Conservative votersLizon said the only polling company he used during his campaign was Electright.
    http://www.mississauga.com/news/article/1307136–lizon-says-he-ran-clean-campaign

    Lizon says he ran clean campaign

    www.mississauga.com

    Conservative MP Wladyslaw Lizon says he ran a clean campaign to win the Mississauga East-Cooksville…


  • Anon: more and more interesting.. the rats will soon be jumping ship..

  • Anon:‎”According to the official minutes of the meeting, there was no mention of Tracey Kent’s reservations – an alleged omission that also made its way into her affidavit and that of former EDA director Richard Larello.

    “Richard Larello??

    http://www.facebook.com/pages/Richard-T-Lorello/67309278765?sk=info

    Richard T. Lorello

    Richard Lorello, an advocate for transparency at Vaughan Council. His efforts h…


  • Anon: Richard T. Lorello with Immigration Min. Jason Kenney
    http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=422415163765&set=a.422402793765.199142.67309278765&type=3&theater

    Richard Lorello

    Richard with Immigration Min. Jason Kenney


  • Anon: Barrie Ont firm ElectRight used by Del Mastro (with parliamentary resources) to promote Ontaria resourcesPM aide Del Mastro apologizes for Ontario election poll – Sep 27, 2011″Dean Del Mastro, prime minister Stephen Harper’s parliamenta…

    PM aide Del Mastro apologizes for Ontario election
    poll | News | National Post

    news.nationalpost.com
    Dean Del Mastro, prime minister Stephen Harper’s parliamentary secretary, apolog…


  • Anon: Federal Corporation Information ElectRight Inc.
    https://www.ic.gc.ca/app/scr/cc/CorporationsCanada/fdrlCrpDtls.html?corpId=7904495

    Corporations Canada – Online Filing Centre

    www.ic.gc.ca
    CBCA-Glossary


  • Anon: http://www.scribd.com/doc/66538325/Release-Elect-Right-Poll

    Release – Elect Right Poll
    www.scribd.com

    Scribd is the world’s largest social reading and publishing site.


  • Anon:From comments on this Barrie Examiner article on there Mayor election (2010? 2011?) regarding Brett McFarquhar the contact for Electright. The links this poster gives for this don’t work (even if you type in manually) or don’t take you to t…
    http://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=brett+harry+mcfarquhar&source=web&cd=7&ved=0CFIQFjAG&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thebarrieexaminer.com%2FArticleDisplay.aspx%3Fe%3D2807173&ei=xmRZT-mPM4eriQKGnc3LCw&usg=AFQjCNHRjB0IEsoSJxQcdXUVaS_uxmzn8g&cad=rja”
    www.google.ca


  • Anon: Bear Cat- Apologies for adding all this info to your post. It probably seems like a lot disparate information unless you were in my head right now. 🙂 I was on a bit of role looking into this. I will probably move all this over to a document but I didn’t want to delete any of it in case others were following along.

  • Anon: Campaign Research Inc., Responsive Marketing Group, Crestview Strategies, Navigator Inc, RackNine and ElectRight are all in on this electoral fraud in my view.

  • Anon: Thanks Anon for the extra names. More research…:) I was trying to see if I could find a connection between ElectRight and RackNine and/or RMG. The information is very elusive and mostly leads to dead ends or 404 Page Not Found.

  • Anon: ‎Anon- I see you commenting over at Creekside from time to time – I like to follow what Allison has to say and love her sense of humor.

  • Anon: Honestly, Anon, I think that the National Campaign ensured that local campaigns had a list of conservative friendly service providers to use, who would deliver services without asking questions. ElectRight and RackNine are not turnkey, full service campaign marketing experts. RMG, Crestview and Campaign Research Inc are bigger fish. Also the bigger fish have connections to Preston Manning’s “Democracy Institute”.

  • Anon: Thanks!

  • Anon: See you at Creekside :-))

  • Anon: ‎:=))

  • Bear Cat: 1st @ Anon… no problem, the post is to try and make people think. I don’t have the answers, if you help light a fire undersome one we all win…

  • Bear Cat: 2nd @ Anon… Could it be as likely that the National Campaign contacted and contracted the various companies and then sent out “polling information” to the constituency offices along with an in and out cheque for $15,000.01? [I think that was the amount]

  • Anon: ‎$15000.01 is probably the maximum amount allowable.

  • Anon: Bear Cat, I have a couple of questions so please shoot me a message via fb, through the site or by email dumpharper@live.ca…

  • Anon: I did a little checking on crest view inc which is basically a company that you can contract to promote whatever BS you are trying to peddle to the public (regardless of whatever fancy rhetoric they may use to sell their ‘product’). The principals seem to hang with the media class providing ‘expert opinion’ etc. which is where you wanna be if you are in the business of promulgating BS and propaganda. 🙂 They are definitely connected to some powerful sources such as the NDI. I haven’t found the connection to Manning’s DI yet but I notice RMG advertising on what appears to be an insider magazine/newsletter they publish, ‘Campaigns and Elections’.So, the bigger fish such as crest view and all, use companies such as rack 9 and elect right as tools in their overall marketing strategies. These smaller fish do the dirtier grunt work of collecting data and narrowing targets that are to be attacked in line with the overall strategy. As well, these smaller fish are used to carry out the ‘dirty tricks’ such as robocalling.

  • Anon:I think you are right Bear Cat that it is likely the national party set this up in advance on recommendation of one, some or all of these marketing gurus. The contracts would have already been in place just a matter of how they were going to pay for them so as to avoid it being noticed, hence the in and out we see with the Quebec Cons. I am wondering if the $15,0000 dollar amounts (and there were several of them) were in ridings where the Cons knew they didn’t have a chance of winning and why we see this concentration of them in Quebec.http://crestviewstrategy.ca/team/

  • Anon: To elaborate on that last point, what I am pondering is if they spread out the cost of targeting a few key swing ridings across the board where only some ridings got the lion’s share of ‘benefit’ while most of the others were just contributing and got nothing for it. It of course, also hid the money from going through as an expense to the national party.

  • Anon: RMG definitely has the capacity to do data mining that lead to targeting 60+ voters. Bear Cat, I am feeling quite confident that whatever work was done by RMG was sent out or used to influence what local campaigns did.

  • Bear Cat: I think the NP is right, the answer is in the computer database in the Stephen Harper Party’s basement….
    Are political parties allowed to keep databases of other parties’ supporters?


  • Anon: Agree Anon, I was thinking seniors was a marketing tool. In the cons riding where I live the last vote was in a seniors home, when previously it has always been in a public school.
  • Anon: There is also a name, Tracey Kent, mentioned in the above comment related to former EDA director Richard Larello…

    Is this Tracey Kent ?

    https://www.facebook.com/tracey.kent

    Tracey Kent



Please feel free to add feedback, additional info, alternative contact details, related links, articles, anonymous submission, etc. as a comment below, via web-form, through social media or mail us directly and confidentially at: dumpharper [at] live [dot] ca


This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. and intend its use to be for education and instructional purposes only. Therefore, we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond “fair use,” you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

ShareAlike Statement: https://dumpharper.wordpress.com/sharealike/

This is not Zimbabwe

Msg  37129 of 38028  at  2/28/2012 11:18:21 PM by ITGIRL

This from the Calgary Herald, no less


This is not Zimbabwe
Allegations of election fraud demand serious response
Calgary Herald February 28, 2012

Some of the Conservative reaction to the growing robocall scandal reminds us of Leslie Nielsen standing in front of an exploding fire-works factory in Naked Gun while telling a gathering crowd, “Move on. Nothing to see here.”

On Monday, Tory Senator Mike Duffy blamed it on third parties. Conservative strategist Tim Powers called it opposition hysteria. On the weekend, Defence Minister Peter MacKay called it an isolated incident. In question period Monday, the unflappable Stephen Harper gave them all a lesson in crisis communications, saying that anyone with evidence of illegal acts should notify Elections Canada, as Harper says his party has done, so the agency can investigate and report back to the House of Commons. It’s the only credible response.

With staff at a Thunder Bay call centre admitting they made live calls scripted by the Conservatives to mislead voters about polling station locations in hotly contested ridings, dismissing the allegations merely reinforces the reputation that this is a bullying, stop-at-nothing government that has muzzled everyone from scientists to veterans’ advocates.

The Conservatives, after all, once hired a polling company to spread the false word that Liberal MP Irwin Cotler of Montreal intended to resign from Parliament – a tactic that Commons Speaker Andrew Scheer later called “reprehensible.” Election fraud is serious. This is not Zimbabwe. If Harper doesn’t want to be perceived as Canada’s version of Robert Mugabe, he and his party have no choice but to co-operate fully with the joint Elections Canada-RCMP investigation underway.

Notwithstanding the utterances of some of their members, the Tories backed a unanimous House of Commons motion put forth by the NDP Monday calling on all MPs to turn over any information they have to what appears to be a widespread Conservative voter-suppression scheme in the 2011 federal election. Blaming it on overly enthusiastic neophytes, as some Tories have done, will never fly. Although a relative few could orchestrate a computerized robocall scheme, a campaign of live voice calls in at least 18 and as many as 40 at-risk ridings could not have taken place without co-ordination and money.

The question that must be answered is how high up the pole this goes. The Harper government’s ethical reputation is at stake. Critics point to the robocalls as the apex of Conservative control politics, ranging from the long-form census issue to removing discretionary sentencing by judges – not to mention pro-rogation of Parliament.

If some riding results are overturned, as they could should a judge determine that dirty tricks resulted in a measurable difference of electors in marginal ridings, the Conservative’s narrow 12-seat majority could be diminished, perhaps even lost. All Tories must respond with the seriousness that this demands.
© Copyright (c) The Calgary Herald

continue reading source: http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/This+Zimbabwe/6219844/story.html


Remember, politics is a contact sport, like hockey, so please feel free to add quick contributions, observations and relevant information as a comment below!

Contact us if you would like to contribute to our collaborative efforts or would like to share/submit articles, data or additional content, feel free to add feedback, additional info, alternative contact details, related links, articles, anonymous submission, etc. as a comment below, via web-form, through social media outlets or email us directly and confidentially at: dumpharper [at] live [dot] ca


This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. and intend its use to be for education and instructional purposes only. Therefore, we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond “fair use,” you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

ShareAlike Statement: https://dumpharper.wordpress.com/sharealike/