#UpInSmoke: #Harper’s #senca #SpeedBall’s #cdnpoli 4 #CPC while #Ford’s #onpoli #Freebase’s #topoli 4 #FordNation

So, here were are. “We the People” are posed with yet another riddle for us to ponder. How many right turns does it take to make a left, how many strikes ’til yer out and how many outs ’till ya switch sides? The plausibly deniable answer to all 3 of the previous 3 is deniably plausible to be 3 if you are 1 that subscribes to the squaring of all circles without the benefit of mathematics.

You see friends, if 1 attempts to square all circles without the benefit of math, one cannot notice that each “right” turn that 1 takes, leads “right” into 1 new direction without any perspective of the previous 1 “right” direction that was “left” behind. What’s more troubling is that when that same 1 direction moves even further to the “right” it not only leaves what was “left” behind, it moves even further away from the previous “right” it just “left” behind, which eventually leads “right” back through the “left” from which the “right” began.

Now, things get rather extreme exponentially if the “right” direction is constantly calculated as the only undeniably plausible direction that can be taken to solve a plausibly deniable problem as many other solutions remain “left” out of any actual problems to be solved. As you can see, this summary will be delivered by squaring circles with the power of 3’s for the benefit of those transfixed and entranced by neo-conservative strategists and communications experts propaganda.

Let’s explore 3 turns that can flip this squared narrative on it’s circular axis:

  1. Who, What, When, Where, Why and How has our Federal Government been compromised by the actions of those within Government, has national Security been compromised and if so, what are the collateral costs?
  2. What are the differences between an individual just making an honest mistake as opposed to a conspirator committing criminal acts under the influence or on behalf of others?
  3. What are the difference between an individual just smoking “crack” cocaine while under the influence as opposed to speed-balling or freebasing in addition to being under the influence?

It should be noted in the beginning that this is really about corruption within Government and organized criminal activities by Government officials that is being shrugged off as business as usual. More importantly, how does one square that circle within the confines of a “right” agenda that has designated those that are “left” of the mandate as enemies? Corruption within government is a problem that the entire global community is dealing with and the whole world is watching the subversion of government and manipulation of justice unfolding in real time right here in Canada at the hands of the Harper Government and their strategically placed minority Loyalists.

  1. What will it take for Harper Loyalists and Ford Nation to wake up to the criminality within Government and what are the collateral costs?
  2. What costs are Harper Loyalists and Ford Nation willing to download unto society to maintain their mandate and grip within Government and what are the collateral costs?
  3. What extremes will Harper Loyalists and Ford Nation go to maintain their grip upon Government to further their “right” agenda and what are the collateral costs?

Sound confusing? Well, that’s how both Stephen Harper and Rob Ford manipulate their almost cult like followers, or should we say congregations? The only prob;em is that their sharp turns along with their lack of attention, to the details, have serious and long lasting implications. The other problem is that it really appears as if neither of them actually do any of the governing, someone else does and that someone also writes the scripts, which may explain the lack of public outcry from the upper classes of society. It is almost as if “they” are either dazed and confused or know that neither Harper nor Ford matter at all. Both Ford and Harper know that considering they play the victim of the liberal media cards so often. Oddly, they both seem to give that same liberal media credit for providing them with previously unknown information.

  1. Is the “right” agenda saving or costing taxpayers money by downloading costs unto society and what are the collateral costs? Example: War on Drugs
  2. Is the “right” agenda saving or costing taxpayers money by promoting criminality within society and what are the collateral costs? Example: War on Crime
  3. Is the “right” agenda saving or costing taxpayers money by economically exploiting society and what are the collateral costs? Example: War on Terror

So how does any of this fit into the fable of 3’s above, well let us count the trilogy of ways below by way of a redundant series of 3’s.

  1. “We the People” need to peek behind the curtain that is the “Senate Scandal” and realize what the Harper Regime and Loyalists believe, or at least want the other 70%+ to believe that even though the Prime Ministers Office has been further implicated in Frauds on the Government, Breach of Trust and Conspiracy the suspension of the 3 Senators is justice served and the rest is all Nigel Wrights doing, period.
  2. “We the People” need to rinse, wash and repeat for the sake of Ford Nation in which we simply change the characters and actions.
  3. “We the People” need to tie them together in the most direct way to cause the least amount of confusion.

Turn 1: Conservative Party of Canada

Can the following 3 facts be undeniably plausible to the Conservative Party of Canada base and caucus if Stephen Harper, the leader of the Conservative Party of Canada, proclaims they are plausibly deniable within the “spirit” of the law? If so, what does that say about the “base” and the “right” direction they seek?

  1. The Prime Minister has no Ministerial knowledge regarding the actions of the Ministerial Office and Ministerial Staff to which the Prime Minister adMinisters?

    Isn’t it “crystal clear” that under Stephen Harper, the Prime Ministers Office now simply facilitates scripts along to the Prime Minister so that the Prime Minister may rehearse, study and distribute the scripts to the Prime Ministers appointed Ministers in the House of Commons and the Senate that may encounter media types.

  2. The Prime Minister has no Ministerial responsibilities regarding the actions of his Ministerial Office and Ministerial Staff to which the Prime Minister adMinisters?

    Isn’t it also “crystal clear” that Prime Minister Stephen Harper has consolidated most of the power into Stephen Harper’s Prime Ministers Office to which Prime Minister Stephen Harper does not question.

  3. The Prime Minister has no responsibilities as the Conservative Party of Canada’s leader regarding the actions of the the Conservative Party of Canada with regards to illegal activities being conducted in the Ministerial Office with the Ministerial Staff to which the Prime Minister adMinisters?

    Isn’t it also “crystal clear” that Prime Minister Stephen Harper believes that the RCMP is responsible for ensuring the enforcement of the “spirit of the law” as envisioned by Stephen Harper’s Prime Ministers Office.


Now Twitter us this:

If Stephen Harper’s Prime Ministers Office does not answer to Prime Minister Stephen Harper, and Prime Minister Stephen Harper does not question Stephen Harper’s Prime Ministers Office, why do we need both? Will the real Stephen Harper please stand up or will the real Prime Minister just stand up?


Turn 2: Ford Nation

Can the following 3 facts be undeniably plausible to the Ford Nation base and caucus if Rob Ford, the leader of the Ford Nation, proclaims they are plausibly deniable within the “spirit” of the law? If so, what does that say about the “base” and the “right” direction they seek?

  1. Rob Ford has no knowledge regarding the actions of Rob Ford or Rob Ford to which Rob Ford is responsible?

    Isn’t it “crystal clear” that under Rob Ford, the Mayors Office simply facilitates the scripts to the Mayor so that Rob Ford may rehearse, study and distribute the scripts along to the Mayors Executive Committee and Sub-committees in the City Council that may encounter media types.

  2. Rob Ford has no Mayoral responsibilities regarding the actions of his Mayoral Office and Mayoral Staff to which Rob Ford Mayors?

    Isn’t it also “crystal clear” that Mayor Rob Ford has consolidated most of the power into Mayor Rob Ford’s Office to which Mayor Rob Ford does not question.

  3. Rob Ford has no responsibilities as the Mayor of Canada’s largest city regarding the actions of the the Mayor of Canada’s largest city with regards to illegal activities being conducted by Rob Ford to which Rob Ford is the Mayor?

    Isn’t it also “crystal clear” that Mayor Rob Ford believes that the Toronto Police are responsible for ensuring the enforcement of the “spirit of the law” as envisioned by Rob Ford’s Mayors Office.


Now Twitter us this:

If Rob Ford does not answer to Rob Ford and Rob Ford does not question Rob Ford unless Rob Ford feels the need to question Rob Ford, why do we need both? Will the real Rob Ford please stand up or will the real Mayor just stand up?


Turn 3: Police State

Can the following 3 series of facts be undeniably plausible when the “State” challenges the “Police State” it created to further it’s “right” agenda against those that are “left” behind? Well, this is where the rubber meets the road, or maybe the cuffs meet the wrists, or the batons meets the faces, or the pepper spray fills the eyes, or the tear gas fills the lungs, or the boots meet the heads, as has been said amongst the serfs.

Let’s begin by exploring the 3 facts that we can now presumably conclude:

  1. The RCMP is conducting investigations into Stephen Harper’s Prime Ministers Office. Investigations that Prime Minister Stephen Harper is uninterested in investigating or acknowledging.
  2. The Toronto Police are conducting investigations into Rob Ford’s Mayors Office. Investigations that Mayor Rob Ford is uninterested in investigating or acknowledging.
  3. There are investigations to be completed, indictments to be presented and crimes that will be left unpunished until well after 2014/2015.

In addition to the “right” fascination with law, order and mandatory minimum punishment, we know the following 3 issues regarding the “State” that have been “left” up to the dependent Police State to decide, keeping in mind that the “State” controls the narrative. This is where selective justice conflicts with not only the Constitution and Charter but many International Laws and Agreements regarding Corruption, Fraud and Abuse of Power. But then again the “Police State” has been given the “right” to unlimited power by the “State” to use as it sees fit against the “left” of the political spectrum.


We can expand these facts by examining 3 additional components:

  1. Both investigations have been seemingly hampered by way of omission and deception.
  2. Both Harper and Ford, have been implicated in interfering into these investigations.
  3. Both Harper and Ford seem to be further contaminating these investigations.

We can then delve further by considering the following key decisions:

  1. With regards to any illegal activities within Stephen Harper’s Prime Ministers Office, Prime Minister Stephen Harper has found that Stephen Harper is 100% not responsible. Case closed.
  2. With regards to any illegal activities within Rob Ford’s Mayors Office, Mayor Rob Ford has found that Rob Ford is 100% not responsible. Case closed.
  3. With regards to any illegal activities, by members “in good standing” of the Conservative Party of Canada, in either and/or both of the above mentioned matters regarding Stephen Harper’s Prime Ministers Office and/or Rob Ford’s Mayors Office have been declared closed by Prime Minister Stephen Harper and/or Mayor Rob Ford.

We can then derive 3 plausible solutions to the root problems:

  1. With regards to any illegal activities within Stephen Harper’s Prime Ministers Office, Prime Minister Stephen Harper has found that Nigel Wright is 100% responsible. Case closed.
  2. With regards to any illegal activities within Rob Ford’s Mayors Office, Mayor Rob Ford has found that Booze is 100% responsible. Case closed.
  3. With regards to any illegal activities, by members “in good standing” of the Conservative Party of Canada, in either and/or both of the above mentioned matters regarding Stephen Harper’s Prime Ministers Office, Nigel Wright and/or Rob Ford’s Mayors Office and/or Booze have been declared closed by Prime Minister Stephen Harper and/or Mayor Rob Ford.

We can then review 3 scenarios:

  1. Last we checked, Nigel Wright and Booze are both still legal, eh?

    Isn’t it “crystal clear” that, while neither, Harper nor Ford, have the legal authority to be the judge, jury and executioner, they have chosen to do so. Stephen Harper say’s it was Nigel Wright and Rob Ford say’s it was Booze.

  2. Last we checked, involvement and participation in the gangs, drugs and weapons industry and defrauding the government are both still illegal, eh?

    Isn’t it “crystal clear” that, we are we being subjugated towards the “right” narrative from the “left” side as well away from many illegal activities? Well the deeper implications are far to complex for any investor to handle as they have a lot of invested in the Harper and Ford Nation Brands, have a whole lot to lose. Not to mention investors like certainty and many of those investors invested in the compromised Senators and Nigel Wright.

  3. Last we checked, involvement and participation in the spreading of false and misleading propaganda are both still illegal, eh?

    Isn’t it “crystal clear” that, this is where the liberal media lie becomes tragically hilarious? The entire msm machine is following and repeating both narratives as scripted by the PMO and Ford Nation, word for word, but by way of omitting the implicating words and replacing them with alternative buzz words depending on the targeted audience.

Now Twitter us this:

Do “We the People” really deserve to be exploited by those reading scripted narratives that claim they will lead us in the “right” direction by way of distracion?


Squared Right Circles Left

Now we can establish the fundamental narrative flaws that lie within the linear minds behind the left/right divides where two wrongs seem to always take a right turn towards the left.

  1. The Harper Government and Ford Nation both claim to be pulling/pushing Canada towards the “right” agenda. With each turn to the “right” they collectively inch ever closer to the far-right extreme elements who are anti-government.

    Isn’t it “crystal clear” that, this is completely insulting to well over 70%+ of Canadians that do not support and/or did not vote for the Conservative Party of Canada in the past 3 elections.

  2. Eventually, this push in turn mixes with the ant-government far-left extreme. Those who are “left” out to further the “right” agenda are then demonized and categorized as the “left” end of the political spectrum.

    Isn’t it “crystal clear” that it would almost seem as if the “right” investors are writing the scripts that compel the “right” bureaucrats to devise equations that combine socio-economic problems with the “right” investment opportunities?

  3. We can now see how the “right” agenda creates the environmental “problems” based upon their own theoretical linear perspective with their own “substitutions” factored into the “equations” they create. In order to achieve the most profitable “answers” to these theoretical problems, the focus gets shifted to solutions that don’t add up to anything other than more investment in crime creation and prevention.

    Isn’t it “crystal clear” that, by way of taxation without representation, it is rather easy to further the mandate of the “right” agenda by way of controlling the “left” side of any problem that has been rightfully created to be solved in a society built upon the “right” equations that factor in a “left” from a spectrum that may not yet exist?


Now Twitter us this:

Do “We the People” really need Harper Loyalists and/or Ford Nation to lead us in the “right” direction?


Fog of War(s)

Let’s ponder 3 “right” issues worth associating to both Stephen Harper and Rob Ford that have been seemingly “left” out of the equation. Then let’s combine the various criminal investigations into Stephen Harper’s Prime Ministers Office and Rob Ford’s Mayors Office that converge within the very agenda that those conflicting war strategies mandates.

  1. War on Drugs: How does 1 reconcile the allocation of tax dollars to a “war” in which Government compromised officials are actively engaged in supporting the illegal drug industry.
  2. War on Crime: How does 1 reconcile the allocation of tax dollars to a “war” in which compromised Government officials are actively engaged in various organized illegal activities including conspiracy, fraud, extortion, blackmail, intimidation, briber , etc.
  3. War on Terror: How does 1 reconcile the allocation of tax dollars to a “war” in which compromised Government officials are actively engaged and supporting through various organized illegal activities, including the activities of terrorists, gangs, drugs and weapons.

Now Twitter us this:

Is it possible for any 1 “left” to reconcile the above 3 mandates as the “right” agenda and direction “We the People” should be headed? Or does this simply prove that 3 rights do make a left…


Summary Conclusion:

It takes exactly 3 right turns to effectively flip a base into believing that they are headed in the “right” direction that eventually leads towards what they just “left” behind…


Now Twitter us this:

How does the “private sector” deal with anti-social behaviour, drug abuse corruption and mismanagement by executives and management?


Further research:

Please note: This is being published on the day of the Twitter IPO, so we changed our usual Riddle us… tagline in honour of our love/hate relationship with the grand master tweeters. Also note that at the time of publication the hyperlinks were not included with the original txt file. This will be remedied in the future as time permits along with a trove of additional research and reference materials…


Remember, politics is a contact sport, like hockey, so please feel free to add quick contributions, observations and relevant information as a comment below!

Contact us if you would like to contribute to our collaborative efforts or would like to share/submit articles, data or additional content, feel free to add feedback, additional info, alternative contact details, related links, articles, anonymous submission, etc. as a comment below, via web-form, through social media outlets or email us directly and confidentially at: dumpharper [at] live [dot] ca


This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. and intend its use to be for education and instructional purposes only. Therefore, we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond “fair use,” you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

ShareAlike Statement: https://dumpharper.wordpress.com/sharealike/

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s