Another CBC Comment Censored

Updated Case for Indictment(s) #CBC #censorship re #Harper #PMO #CPC vs #cdnpoli #senca

Alrighty then, something is really rotten here. This “disabled” comment is the second, of only two, comments we have ever attempted to post on the CBC website, the other can be viewed here. Riddle us this gang… Can anyone spot any potential violations as far as “commenting” moderation is concerned? The copypasta of the text is below, along with an updated hashtag plus the screenshot and the links below…

Another CBC Comment Censored
CBC Comment Censored

Your Submission Guidelines?

Comments on this story are pre-moderated. Before they appear, comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure they meet our submission guidelines. Comments are open and welcome for three days after the story is published. We reserve the right to close comments before then.

Your Published Article?

Power & Politics Ballot Box question: Is the Prime Minister responsible for the actions of his office? by Evan Solomon Posted: October 29, 2013 4:10 PM Last Updated: October 29, 2013 4:12 PM http://www.cbc.ca/newsblogs/politics/inside-politics-blog/2013/10/power-politics-ballot-box-question-322.html

Our Attempted Offensive Reply?

Content disabled
Operation Harper

This is a simple case for indictments against many individuals, not only the Prime Ministers Office, House of Commons, Conservative Senate Leadership, Conservative Caucus members involved in Senator’s Mike Duffy, Pamela Wallin and Patrick Brazeau various issues, but Stephen Harper, the seemingly blind and unaware “sitting” Prime Minister and seemingly blind and unaware “active” CEO of the Conservative Party of Canada and it’s wholly owned subsidiary, the Harper Government.

The undeniable plausibility of guilt based upon unproven facts in the case of “Harper v. Senate” are as preposterous as is the assumption of innocence based upon the plausible deniability of proven facts in the case of the “Harper v. Truth”. As a matter of fact, if due process is circumvented in such a selective fashion based upon the “beliefs” of one person who opaquely conducts his “private sector” CEO business for the “base” with his “public sector” PMO responsibility to those he serves, aka: the other 70%+ of Canadians. This hear-no-evil, see-no-evil, speak-no-evil Ministerial/Executive technique becomes very dangerous when the CEO and PMO both “believe” in “spirits” of laws/rules as opposed to “letters” of written laws and rules. Especially when the ideological spirits evoked are opaquely envisioned within an undefined belief system and contained within one mind. This can quickly accelerate into a National security issue and economic threat as the spirits of the laws can be arbitrarily created and selectively applied through all levels of society very quickly. This delves into criminal when the ideological spirits evoked are opaquely envisioned within an undefined belief system.

btw: Nigel Wright? What ever happened to Pitbull Dean Del Mastro?

continue reading source: http://www.cbc.ca/newsblogs/politics/inside-politics-blog/2013/10/power-politics-ballot-box-question-322.html


Remember, politics is a contact sport, like hockey, so please feel free to add quick contributions, observations and relevant information as a comment below!

Contact us if you would like to contribute to our collaborative efforts or would like to share/submit articles, data or additional content, feel free to add feedback, additional info, alternative contact details, related links, articles, anonymous submission, etc. as a comment below, via web-form, through social media outlets or email us directly and confidentially at: dumpharper [at] live [dot] ca


This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. and intend its use to be for education and instructional purposes only. Therefore, we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond “fair use,” you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

ShareAlike Statement: https://dumpharper.wordpress.com/sharealike/

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Updated Case for Indictment(s) #CBC #censorship re #Harper #PMO #CPC vs #cdnpoli #senca”

  1. Please note the following inquiry that was recently sent via CBC website contact page [http://www.cbc.ca/contact/] for clarification and yes we did receive a “thank you” confirmation [http://www.cbc.ca/contact/thankYou.html] that the form was indeed submitted:

    Greetings CBC Staff,

    Before we jump to conclusions and consider a legal remedy to this issue, we would like to afford you to clarify your submission guidelines with regards to the following “Content disabled” aka: censored comment that was posted with regards to the Power & Politics Ballot Box question, “Is the Prime Minister responsible for the actions of his office?” by Evan Solomon Posted: October 29, 2013 4:10 PM Last Updated: October 29, 2013 4:12 PM

    ———————–
    Content disabled
    Operation Harper

    This is a simple case for indictments against many individuals, not only the Prime Ministers Office, House of Commons, Conservative Senate Leadership, Conservative Caucus members involved in Senator’s Mike Duffy, Pamela Wallin and Patrick Brazeau various issues, but Stephen Harper, the seemingly blind and unaware “sitting” Prime Minister and seemingly blind and unaware “active” CEO of the Conservative Party of Canada and it’s wholly owned subsidiary, the Harper Government.

    The undeniable plausibility of guilt based upon unproven facts in the case of “Harper v. Senate” are as preposterous as is the assumption of innocence based upon the plausible deniability of proven facts in the case of the “Harper v. Truth”. As a matter of fact, if due process is circumvented in such a selective fashion based upon the “beliefs” of one person who opaquely conducts his “private sector” CEO business for the “base” with his “public sector” PMO responsibility to those he serves, aka: the other 70%+ of Canadians. This hear-no-evil, see-no-evil, speak-no-evil Ministerial/Executive technique becomes very dangerous when the CEO and PMO both “believe” in “spirits” of laws/rules as opposed to “letters” of written laws and rules. Especially when the ideological spirits evoked are opaquely envisioned within an undefined belief system and contained within one mind. This can quickly accelerate into a National security issue and economic threat as the spirits of the laws can be arbitrarily created and selectively applied through all levels of society very quickly. This delves into criminal when the ideological spirits evoked are opaquely envisioned within an undefined belief system.

    btw: Nigel Wright? What ever happened to Pitbull Dean Del Mastro?

    ——————

    Please note that this is the second occurance in as many attempts and the last time you failed to reply to our inquiry. To make it easy we have published and shared the initial details here: https://dumpharper.wordpress.com/2013/10/30/updated-case-for-indictments-cbc-censorship-re-harper-pmo-cpc-vs-cdnpoli-senca/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s