Content Disabled

#opTeaKettle asks: @CBCNews @CBCPolitics: What is wrong with this #cdnpoli Picture worth a thousand?

Simple riddle to a riddle of an issue, apparently that puzzles CBC Top Stories@CBCNews and CBC Politics@CBCPolitics and #CBC in general at this point.

To make this question/story/answer/short let’s attempt to get to the root which lies beneath the story that led to the rejection of a rather simple comment to the article below. But first, please allow us to explain why we sent you this way. We smell a Gatekeeper. Please proceed to reference your own published article, as to it to enlighten yourselves of what the implications “could” be. Keep in mind, as your masters within the matrix are aware with their spam filters etc., we have never, ever, ever even attempted to post a comment to an article, but this one was important in our opinion based upon the facts that are within an Act that may or may not relate, but let’s let the court decide. This was a simple comment that did not deserve, in a lot of folks opinions, banishment.

Content Disabled
CBC Comment Censored

What’s the worse thing that can happen if we drag these people through the courts? At this point, considering the “narrative” geared towards the various “War’s on Inc”, professional and amateur terrorists, counter terrorists, underground sea-creature terrorists, space alien terrorists, who really cares if some complicit people that did some horrific crimes against humanity have to stand trial but will most likely die in prison awaiting their day in court? Who cares, Lady Justice is Blind, period. They are almost done here anyway, round ’em up, send ’em to Gitmo, who cares.

Oddly, judging the comments we are reviewing right NOW, in real time, it appears as if not only was our comment acceptable based upon your “submission guidelines”, a few may have “liked” it maybe they would have all “flagged” it, who knows. Is it “flag-able” ? Is it Offensive? Really? Please allow ourselves, by reviewing some things below, to refresh our memories of what Canada is, or maybe what it was?

Your Submission Guidelines?

Comments on this story are pre-moderated. Before they appear, comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure they meet our submission guidelines. Comments are open and welcome for three days after the story is published. We reserve the right to close comments before then.

Your Published Article?

Experiments on aboriginal people ‘monstrous,’ Paul Martin says Former PM urges federal government to disclose all records on testing ‘horrors’ By Kathleen Harris, CBC News Posted: Jul 18, 2013 6:09 PM ET Last Updated: Jul 18, 2013 6:30 PM ET Continue reading here: http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2013/07/18/pol-reax-aboriginal-experiments.html (we’ll cache and archive it later for future reference, since it will be referenced where it CAN be commented upon)

Our Attempted Offensive Reply?

Content disabled
  • Operation Harper

Let’s see how this SHOULD transpire, as the following may show, and find out what kind the Harper Regime is all about. Keep in mind, technicalities have NEVER stopped them from doing the undo-able. Let’s keep in mind why, this act became and act. Below is a potion of section 4.

Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act S.C. 2000, c. 24 Assented to 2000-06-29 – An Act respecting genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes and to implement the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, and to make consequential amendments to other Acts
Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and House of Commons of Canada, enacts as follows: http://www.canlii.org/ca/sta/c-45.9/

OFFENCES WITHIN CANADA

Genocide, etc., committed in Canada

4. (1) Every person is guilty of an indictable offence who commits

(a) genocide;

(b) a crime against humanity; or

(c) a war crime.

Conspiracy, attempt, etc.

(1.1) Every person who conspires or attempts to commit, is an accessory after the fact in relation to, or counsels in relation to, an offence referred to in subsection (1) is guilty of an indictable offence.

Punishment

(2) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1) or (1.1)

(a) shall be sentenced to imprisonment for life, if an intentional killing forms the basis of the offence; and

(b) is liable to imprisonment for life, in any other case.« less

  • 1 hour ago
  • 0 Likes

Thousand Dollar Pictures?

Where is it, behind the little "View 1 more reply"
Where is it, behind the little “View 1 more reply”
It is NOT behind the little "View 1 more reply"
It is NOT behind the little “View 1 more reply”

 

continue reading source: http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2013/07/18/pol-reax-aboriginal-experiments.html

Or maybe just skip reading any of them anyway, Commies and Nazi’s make us sick, PUKE!


Remember, politics is a contact sport, like hockey, so please feel free to add quick contributions, observations and relevant information as a comment below!

Contact us if you would like to contribute to our collaborative efforts or would like to share/submit articles, data or additional content, feel free to add feedback, additional info, alternative contact details, related links, articles, anonymous submission, etc. as a comment below, via web-form, through social media outlets or email us directly and confidentially at: dumpharper [at] live [dot] ca


This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. and intend its use to be for education and instructional purposes only. Therefore, we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond “fair use,” you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

ShareAlike Statement: https://dumpharper.wordpress.com/sharealike/

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “#opTeaKettle asks: @CBCNews @CBCPolitics: What is wrong with this #cdnpoli Picture worth a thousand?”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s